Abstract:The paper by K. Sengupta et al. (Opt. Express 32, 40150-40164, 2024) explores quantum illumination using polarization-entangled photon pairs for object detection in noisy environments. In this comment, we highlight fundamental flaws in the mathematical model used to describe photon loss. We argue that the treatment of photon loss and its effects on quantum entanglement is incorrect. We demonstrate that the conclusions of Sengupta et al., particularly the detection of low-reflectivity objects using quantum correlations, are unsubstantiated, as the assumed resilience of polarization entanglement to photon loss contradicts established principles of quantum information theory. We present a more rigorous framework for describing the effects of photon loss on both polarization-encoded and photon-number quantum states. Additionally, we critique the approach used in the OE article to model photon loss in free-space optical (FSO) transmission, noting that it is based on a fiber-optic model that was adopted with insufficient attribution from an earlier publication. We propose several improvements to enhance the modeling of FSO photon loss.

Comment on “quantum Key Distribution with Blind Polarization Bases”

Comment On "Quantum Key Distribution With Blind Polarization Bases"

Comment on “Ground-State Description of Quasi-One-dimensional Polarons with Arbitrary Electron-Phonon Coupling Strength”

Qin Et Al. Reply

Comment on "focusing of High Polarization Order Axially-Symmetric Polarized Beams" [chin. Opt. Lett. 7, 938 (2009)]

Comment on "Inherent security of phase coding quantum key distribution systems against detector blinding attacks" [Laser Phys. Lett. 15, 095203 (2018)]

Comment On "Ferroelectric Order Of Parallel Bistable Hydrogen Bonds"

Comment on “berry Phase in a Composite System”

Gao et al. Reply

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Response to Comment on "Pairing and Phase Separation in a Polarized Fermi Gas"

Quantum Beats in Photon Echo from Four-Waving Mixing.

Comment on Quantum illumination using polarization-entangled photon pairs for enhanced object detection (Opt. Express 32, 40150-40164, 2024)

Wexleret Al.reply:

Xiang et al. reply.

Comment on "A Random Quantum Key Distribution Achieved by Using Bell States"

Polarization Transfer in the ^4He(\vec e,e'\vec p)^3H Reaction up to Q^2 = 2.6 (GeV/c)^2

Comment on “Plasmon-Enhanced Ultraviolet Photoluminescence from Hybrid Structures of Graphene/ZnO Films”

Reply to comment in <a class="link-https" data-arxiv-id="1802.01382" href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01382">arXiv:1802.01382</a>

Robust Countermeasure Against Detector Control Attack in a Practical Quantum Key Distribution System: Reply

Yaoet Al.reply: