Thermally Activated Energies Ofyba2cu3o7−δand

Y. Z. Zhang,Hai‐Hu Wen,Zhi Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.74.144521
IF: 3.7
2006-01-01
Physical Review B
Abstract:Resistivities of $\mathrm{Y}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\delta}}$ and Ca doped ${\mathrm{Y}}_{0.8}{\mathrm{Ca}}_{0.2}{\mathrm{Ba}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\delta}}$ thin films are studied around superconducting transition regions in different magnetic fields. Based on a theoretical prediction of the resistivity $\ensuremath{\rho}=(2{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{c}U∕T)\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}U∕T)$ and experimental data, thermally activated energy $U$ and the derivative $\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\partial}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{ln}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\rho}∕\ensuremath{\partial}{T}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ are studied for determining the consistency between experimental data and different characterizing processes. The study shows that the widely accepted assumption, $(2{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{c}U∕T)$ being a constant, is probably misleading in characterizing the vortex behaviors. If we overthrow the assumption and assume that ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{c}$ is temperature independent in $\ensuremath{\rho}=(2{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{c}U∕T)\mathrm{exp}(\ensuremath{-}U∕T)$, we have that $\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\partial}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{ln}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\rho}∕\ensuremath{\partial}{T}^{\ensuremath{-}1}=(1\ensuremath{-}T∕U)(U\ensuremath{-}T\ensuremath{\partial}U∕\ensuremath{\partial}T)$. The corresponding regressions of $\ensuremath{\rho}(T,H)$ and $\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\partial}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{ln}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\rho}(T,H)∕\ensuremath{\partial}{T}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ are in good agreement with experimental data and result in a completely different scale of the thermally activated energy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?