Abstract:The article considers the personal interest of Marx and the Marxist tradition in changing the world. As a rule, and this can be explained by political reasons, Marx and Engels are credited with an identical position on this issue. The author shows that this is a simplification and offers his interpretation based on the primacy of philosophical origins for the development of Marx's ideas. In this case, Marx turns out to be a Hegelian and a critic of Aristotle, while Engels remains an anti-Hegelian. Engels follows Schelling in denying Hegel, and Marx builds his concept on the basis of Hegel's theory of the modern world, while simultaneously challenging the Aristotelian concept of economic value. Engels denies contemporary philosophy, giving priority to science and so-called scientific socialism. Marxist economics, on the other hand, arises as a reaction of Marx to Aristotelian intuitions. The author shows that Marx's philosophy and the Marxist tradition should be distinguished not only because of the various embodiments of the latter, but primarily because of their different philosophical origins. This differentiation of the ideas of Marx himself and the Marxism growing out of Engel's interpretation can be carried out based on the formulation of the question of the relationship of being and thinking in cognition proposed by Parmenides. For Engels, questions of epistemology boil down to the fact that thinking about being and being itself should coincide. Later, this materialistic approach will form the basis of reflection theory. Marx's position is more complicated and can be characterized as idealistic. It is this fundamental discrepancy that determines the difference between the attitude of Marx and the Marxist tradition to the question of the longing to change the world.

Una Riflessione Su Vico E Il Materialismo Marxista Nel Capitale

Is Marx a materialist

Remarks on Marx and Changing the World

"On Capital" and the Microscopic Foundation of Historical Materialism:Taking Marx's Productivity Theory as Example

Hegel and the Origins of Marxism—remarks on Russian and Chinese Marxism

Marx, Hegel and ‘Contradiction’

Karl Korsch on Marx’s New Materialism

On Della Volpe's Explanation of Essence of Marxian Methodology

A Discussion about the Ontological Foundation of Marx's Practical Materialism——As a Reply to Mr. Dong Xuewen

On Recovering Marx after Marxism

On the Eve of a Turn for Materialism and Communism:Rethinking the Thought Development of Marx in the Period of Rheinische Zeitung

A preliminary study of the relational-generative theory from the perspective of practical materialism:Note III of Rereading Marx's Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844

On Marx's Transcendence over Philosophical Materialism and the Revolutionary Significance of His New Materialism——A Review of "Marx's Natural Concept" by Schimitt

Alcuni Aspetti Del Sogno Di Marx

Marx's Initial Focus and Early Exploration on the Material Interests: Discrimination of Academia Three Questions

Concept Dimension of Historical Materialism:a New Interpretation

The Scientific Connotation of Historical Materialism and Its Practice and Development in the Context of the New Era

The Position of Mill Notes by Karl Marx in the History of Thoughts

Reflection Upon the Way to Understand Marxist Philosophy——Inferences from on the Two Facts of Relationships Between Marx and Feuerbach

Marx and Engels' Critique of Young Hegelianism and Its Significance

Materiality and Subject in Marxism, (Post-)Structuralism, and Material Semiotics