Abstract:The article considers the personal interest of Marx and the Marxist tradition in changing the world. As a rule, and this can be explained by political reasons, Marx and Engels are credited with an identical position on this issue. The author shows that this is a simplification and offers his interpretation based on the primacy of philosophical origins for the development of Marx's ideas. In this case, Marx turns out to be a Hegelian and a critic of Aristotle, while Engels remains an anti-Hegelian. Engels follows Schelling in denying Hegel, and Marx builds his concept on the basis of Hegel's theory of the modern world, while simultaneously challenging the Aristotelian concept of economic value. Engels denies contemporary philosophy, giving priority to science and so-called scientific socialism. Marxist economics, on the other hand, arises as a reaction of Marx to Aristotelian intuitions. The author shows that Marx's philosophy and the Marxist tradition should be distinguished not only because of the various embodiments of the latter, but primarily because of their different philosophical origins. This differentiation of the ideas of Marx himself and the Marxism growing out of Engel's interpretation can be carried out based on the formulation of the question of the relationship of being and thinking in cognition proposed by Parmenides. For Engels, questions of epistemology boil down to the fact that thinking about being and being itself should coincide. Later, this materialistic approach will form the basis of reflection theory. Marx's position is more complicated and can be characterized as idealistic. It is this fundamental discrepancy that determines the difference between the attitude of Marx and the Marxist tradition to the question of the longing to change the world.

On Della Volpe's Explanation of Essence of Marxian Methodology

Rupture in Methodology: Della-Volpe's Interpretation of Marx's Philosophical Revolution and Its Predicament

The Question of Marx-Engels in Colletti's Vision

Positive Abandon of Self-Alienation——Inquiry in Marx’s Methodology in His Revealing the Alienated Labor

A Discussion about the Ontological Foundation of Marx's Practical Materialism——As a Reply to Mr. Dong Xuewen

The Tradition of Logocentrism in Western Philosophy and the Revolution of Marx's Philosophy

Read the Essentiality of Marx's Philosophical Revolution in the Thesis "consciousness is Determined by Life"

The Essentiality of Marx's Conversion on the Problem of Alienation——Debates between Zhang Kuiliang and Yu wujin

Marx, Hegel and ‘Contradiction’

Marx and Engels' Critique of Young Hegelianism and Its Significance

On Marx's Transcendence over Philosophical Materialism and the Revolutionary Significance of His New Materialism——A Review of "Marx's Natural Concept" by Schimitt

Marx's Sublimation of the Ontology of Matter

Remarks on Marx and Changing the World

A Contradiction in Marxist Literary Theory and Its Cultural Origin

Re-interpreting the Revolutionary Significance in the Reform of Marx's Philosophy——In the Perspective of Western Philosophical Researches

Leaping from Speculation to Science——on the Internal Logic of the Generation of Historical Materialism Through Marx' Theory of Alienation

Philosophy and Marxism:Decoding Sartre's The Problem of Method

Stirner's "the Ego and His Own" and Marx's Philosophical Revolution

Marx's Reconstruction of Hegel' S Method and Its Inspiration

The Philosophical Method of Marx's Economic Assumptions as Exemplified in the Relationship between Two Definitions of "Socially Necessary Labor Time"

The Turning Point of Marx’s Thoughts:the Theory of the Alienation of Commerce in Glossen zu James Mill