Abstract:Purpose Existing literature in experimental accounting research suggests that accounting professionals and people with accounting backgrounds tend to have a lower level of moral reasoning and ethical development. Motivated by these findings, this paper aims to examine whether chief executive officers (CEOs) with accounting backgrounds have an impact on firms’ earnings management behavior and the level of accounting conservatism. Design/methodology/approach The authors classify CEOs into those with and without accounting backgrounds using BoardEx data. Using discretionary accruals from several different models, they do not find that CEOs with accounting backgrounds are more likely to engage in income-increasing accruals. However, the authors find that CEOs with accounting backgrounds exhibit lower levels of conservatism, proxied by C-scores and T-scores (Basu, 1997). This finding suggests that CEOs with accounting backgrounds recognize bad news more quickly than good news, consistent with the accounting principle of “anticipating all losses but anticipating no gains”. Findings The authors show that firms whose CEOs have accounting backgrounds exhibit lower levels of accounting conservatism. However, these firms do not exhibit higher levels of income-increasing discretionary accruals. This study documents the impact of CEOs’ educational backgrounds on firms’ accounting choices and confirms prior findings in experimental accounting research using large sample archival data. Originality/value This paper is the first study that investigates the impact of CEOs’ accounting backgrounds on firms’ financial reporting policy. The findings may have some policy implications. If accounting backgrounds of CEOs can make a significant difference on firms’ behavior, it is reasonable to make CEOs accountable for the quality of financial reporting. This paper is one of the first to empirically test inferences drawn by experimental accounting research. There has been a gap between archival and experimental accounting studies. The authors propose that interesting research questions can be addressed by filling in such a gap.

Business Education of CEO-CFO and Annual Report Readability

Accounting executives and readability of 10-K reports

The Path to Reporting Economic Reality - Why All CEOs Should Have Accounting Degrees

CEO educational backgrounds and non-GAAP earnings disclosures

The Impact of CEOs’ Accounting Backgrounds on Earnings Management and Conservatism

The Effect of Annual Report Readability on Analyst Following and the Properties of Their Earnings Forecasts

Busy CEO and financial statement footnotes readability: evidence from Indonesia

Annual Report Readability and Trade Credit Financing: Evidence from China

Is Education Beneficial to Environmentally Friendly Behaviors? Evidence from CEOs

Earnings management and readability of CSR report: Evidence from China

Is the CEOs’ financial and accounting education experience valuable? Evidence from the perspective of M&A performance

Financial Report Readability and Stock Return Synchronicity

CEO Communications and ESG Performance: Deciphering the Impact of Corporate Narratives

Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence

Annual Report Readability and the Cost of Equity Capital

Supervision or collusion? CEO–CFO social ties and financial reporting quality

Corporate social responsibility report readability, credit ratings and cost of borrowing

Do powerful CEOs affect qualitative financial disclosure? Evidence from accounting comparability

The Effect of Accounting Academics in the Boardroom on the Value Relevance of Financial Reporting Information

Credit Default Swap Spreads and Annual Report Readability

Corporate Secretary Professional Expertise and Annual Report Readability