Abstract:Research aims: This study examines the relationship between the CEOs’ income and the quality of financial statements of industrial firms listed on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HSX) during the three years from 2018 to 2020.Design/Methodology/Approach: This study investigated the influence of CEOs’ characteristics, particularly their income, on the quality of financial statements of listed firms in the Vietnamese industry by using features of information quality proposed by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Random Effects model (REM), Fixed Effects model (FEM), and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) regressions were applied for empirical examinations.Research findings: The results of this study demonstrated that a CEO’s income positively affected the quality of corporate financial statements. Additionally, the analysis results confirmed the positive correlation between the firm’s size and the quality of disclosed reports, consistent with prior studies. However, this study uncovered that Big4 auditors did not influence the quality of financial statements.Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive perspective on the assessment of corporate financial statements quality and examining its association with the CEO’s income in the context of an emerging economy.Practitioner/Policy implication: The study is useful for investors and other financial statement users to assess the quality of corporate financial statements through the CEO’s profile; it also contributes as a scientific basis for firms to adjust the compensations offered to their CEOs.Research limitation: This study was limited by looking at the mono-directional impact of the CEO’s income on the financial statement quality. The following studies need a larger sample of industries and countries to strengthen the research findings. Also, further studies can broaden their perspectives to investigate the multidimensionality of this relation.

Do powerful CEOs affect qualitative financial disclosure? Evidence from accounting comparability

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Do financial performance and firm's value affect the quality of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Moderating role of chief executive officer's power in China

Corporate social responsibility and financial statement comparability: Evidence from China

The Impact of CEO Duality and Financial Performance on CSR Disclosure: Empirical Evidence from State-Owned Enterprises in China

Does Mutual Tenure of CFOs and Auditors Affect Accounting Information Comparability? Evidence from China

CEO power, board features and ESG performance: An extensive novel moderation analysis

CEO Power, Internal Control Quality, and Audit Committee Effectiveness in Substance Versus in Form

Does the income of the chief executive officer affect the quality of corporate financial statements? An evidence from industrial firms in Vietnam

The effect of CEO's compensation in driving corporate ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China

Executives with financial backgrounds and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China

A Comparison of CEO Pay-Performance Sensitivity in Privately-Held and Public Firms

Influence of CEO Characteristics on Accounting Information Disclosure Quality—Based on the Mediating Effect of Capital Structure

The Mechanisms of Chief Executive Officer Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting: Evidence From Chinese-Listed Firms

Effects of CEO Overseas Experience on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Listed Companies

Managerial ability and accounting comparability: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Does CFO serving as board secretary matter for information disclosure? Evidence from China’s listed companies

When are Powerful CEOs Beneficial ?

Financial Statement Comparability and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance

Corporate social responsibility, CEO characteristics, and earnings management: Evidence from China

The impact of media attention, board independence on CEO power, and ESG in state-owned enterprises