Abstract:With the increasing focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on a global scale, stakeholders expect businesses to transform and enhance social responsibility. Over time, ESG and CSR have developed into vital performance metrics for businesses. Businesses are actively putting improvement measures into place in response to this new paradigm in order to stay competitive in this changing environment. China's dual commitment to CSR and sustainable development is in line with wider objectives, such as resolving issues of pay inequality. In 2012, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) unveiled the "Green Credit Guidelines" (GCG), which take corporate governance's environmental considerations into account. These regulations set standards and specifically target high-pollution corporations. Companies may need to restructure their corporate structures and create efficient governance mechanisms in order to comply with these regulations and reduce carbon emissions. This will have an impact on the compensation packages of executives and regular employees. The most important question is how the "GCG" will affect the wage disparity in highly polluting companies. This study examines the 2012 "GCG" and its potential to reduce internal wage disparities, viewing it as a critical element of green financial policy. The paper uses data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2020. Besides, it uses the Difference-in-Differences method to assess the impact of China's GCG, treating its implementation as a quasi-natural experiment and controlling for concurrent policy effects to precisely identify its net impact on corporate carbon emissions and internal wage disparities. The findings show that "GCG" considerably closed internal wage disparities. Furthermore, the "GCG" has a path of guidance, incentives, and punishments that reduce internal wage disparities and promote a more equitable wage distribution within businesses. According to heterogeneity analysis, policies have a greater impact on the wage gap in businesses that are highly dependent on outside funding and have political connection. In order to achieve a compensation balance and meet the objectives of social responsibility and corporate sustainable development, the government should strengthen the complementary effects of green financial policies. The compensation balance in highly polluting companies has important theoretical and practical ramifications. On the one hand, it represents the convergence of income equality, corporate governance, and environmental responsibility. It helps to expand knowledge of sustainable development, fair compensation, and environmental policies. On the other hand, the widening pay disparity between executives and average employees reflects the exacerbation of income inequality in China, which could potentially impact companies' long-term development. Conversely, a well-balanced pay plan can improve worker productivity and motivation while empowering stakeholders to make wise investment choices.

The effect of CEO's compensation in driving corporate ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China

Executive pay gap and corporate ESG greenwashing: Evidence from China

Executive compensation and corporate sustainability: Evidence from ESG ratings

From greed to good: how government regulations of executive compensation impact corporate ESG performance?

Do academic executives influence corporate ESG performance? Evidence from China

CEO turnover and ESG greenwashing: evidence from China

How do CEO's green characteristics affect ESG performance?

CEO Experience and Enterprise Environment, Social and Governance Performance: Evidence from China

The impact of executives' green experience on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: Evidence from China

Can the green experience of CEO improve ESG performance in heavy polluting companies? Evidence from China

Green finance and high-pollution corporate compensation - Empirical evidence from green credit guidelines

Top Executives' Compensation, Industrial Competition, and Corporate Environmental Performance Evidence from China

CEO Career Concern and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China

Study on the Effect of CEO Green Background on Firm Performance Based on the Mediating Role of ESG Disclosure

Regulating CEO pay and green innovation: moderating role of social capital and government subsidy

The impact of media attention, board independence on CEO power, and ESG in state-owned enterprises

Corruption-induced CEO Compensation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in China

A cross‐cultural study of ESG impact on corporate performance and equity

The ESG performance influence mechanism analysis-based on empirical analysis

Impact of executive pay gap on environmental, social, and governance disclosure in China: Is there a strategic choice?

Does CEO social capital affect corporate ESG performance?