Abstract:Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance reflects the alignment of firms with national strategies and macroeconomic development principles, and serves as a crucial foundation for achieving sustainable development. Investigating the factors driving corporate ESG performance has significant theoretical and practical implications. This study utilizes data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies in China from 2010 to 2022 and theoretically analyzes and empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of executives' green experience on overall ESG performance and performance on each element of ESG. The results indicate that executives' green experience enhances the efficiency of corporate green patent innovation, thereby improving environmental performance. In addition, green experiences foster environmental investment and charitable donations, leading to better social performance. Executives with green experience also attract green investors and analysts' attention, thereby improving corporate governance and ultimately positively affecting overall corporate ESG performance. The robustness of these findings is confirmed through alternative variable measurements, Propensity Score Matching(PSM) Tests, Entropy Balancing Tests, Instrumental Variable Tests, and controlling for the impact of significant public health events. Further analysis revealed that the positive effects of executives' green experiences on corporate ESG performance are more pronounced in non-heavily polluting corporations, non-state-owned corporations, and firms where executives have higher power. This study enriches research on the consequences of executives' green experiences and the determinants of corporate ESG performance, extending the boundaries of how executive characteristics influence micro-level corporate outcomes. It also provides valuable references for regulatory bodies promoting ESG practices and decision-making by capital market participants.

The impact of media attention, board independence on CEO power, and ESG in state-owned enterprises

Differences in Board Independence’s Impact on ESG with Respect to Power Constraints: Evidence from a Heterogeneity Perspective

A Study on the Impact of Board Characteristics on the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Responsibilities of Listed Companies—Evidence from Chinese Listings

Help or hindrance? The impact of female executives on corporate ESG performance in China

CEO Experience and Enterprise Environment, Social and Governance Performance: Evidence from China

Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk

The ESG performance influence mechanism analysis-based on empirical analysis

The impact of environmental, social, and governance on corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence based on Chinese a-share listed companies

Corporate Governance, Media Coverage, and Corporate Environmental Protection Investment: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in China’s High-Pollution Industries

CEO power, board features and ESG performance: An extensive novel moderation analysis

Impact of Corporate Governance on Environmental Information Disclosure-Evidence from China

The Moderating Effect of Board Characteristics in the Relationship Between ESG and Corporate Financial Performance

ESG ratings and corporate success: analyzing the environmental governance impact on Chinese companies’ performance

Environmental Background Directors and ESG Performance: A Perspective on Green Governance

The impact of executives' green experience on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: Evidence from China

Influence of Media Attention on the Quality of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information Disclosure in Enterprises: An Adjustment Effect Based on the Shareholder Relationship Network

Media coverage and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China

Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Corporate Sustainable Development in China

Does state capital equity affect ESG performance of private firms?—based on the perspective of sustainable development of Chinese enterprises

Do academic executives influence corporate ESG performance? Evidence from China