Abstract:According to the theoretical and empirical research,the board of directors is one of the most important mechanisms that control and supervise the managerial opportunism behavior,and the effective board monitoring can help to restrain the financially fraudulent behavior.However,the effectiveness of corporate governance,especially board monitoring,attracted the attention of government and academic scholars in the wake of the corporate accounting scandals such as Enron and WorldCom.From the perspective of the high quality of external auditing demand,this paper investigates the impact of board gender diversity on the effectiveness of board governance.We empirically examines the impacts of board gender diversity and managerial power on the demand for external audit,using the data from the Chinese listed companies during the periods 2002-2006.We use audit fee,Big Ten and Big Four as measures for higher quality of audit demand,and board with at least one female director and proportion of female directors on the boardroom as measures for board gender diversity.After controlling for other known board,firm and industry characteristics,we find that board gender diversity is associated with higher demand for external audit,this indicates that gender diversity in board of directors can help to improve the quality of external audit;however,the positive effect of board gender diversity on demand for external audit exists only when managerial power is lower.These results indicate that it is difficult for female directors to monitor the managers when managerial power is high due to the low degree of board gender diversity in Chinese listed companies.Our paper contributes to the growing literature that provides evidence on the linkage between board monitoring mechanisms and financial reporting and audit processes.More specifically,it extends the literature on the relationship between board characteristics and audit process.Further,this paper adds to the audit quality literature by showing that managerial power is of significant effect on the relationship between board characteristics and audit quality.

The Effect of Accounting Academics in the Boardroom on the Value Relevance of Financial Reporting Information

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

Corporate Governance,Enforcement of Accounting Standards and Value-Relevance of Earnings

Short Selling and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Chinese AH Shares

From Classroom to Boardroom: the Value of Academic Independent Directors in China

The Value of Academic Directors to Stakeholders: Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Managerial Academic Experience, External Monitoring And Financial Reporting Quality

Beyond the ivory tower: Professors on the board and corporate performance in China

The Value of Academics: Evidence From Academic Independent Director Resignations in China

Board informal hierarchy and audit quality: evidence from China

Research on the Report of the Accounting-majors being Independent Board

Worldwide Board Reforms and Financial Reporting Quality

Do Politically Connected Directors Affect Accounting Quality? Evidence from China's Anti-Corruption Campaign (rule 18)

Board Financial Experience And Efficiency-Based Earnings Management In Pre- And Post-International Financial Reporting Standards

Does Audit Committee Accounting Expertise Help to Promote Audit Quality? Evidence from Auditor Reporting of Internal Control Weaknesses

China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and Financial Reporting Quality

State Ownership,Environment Uncertainty and Governance Role of Accounting Information

Audit services and financial reporting quality: The role of accounting expertise auditors

Imprinting Effect of Economic Conditions on CFOs' Judgment and Accounting Information Quality

Audit Committee Mechanisms and the Improvement of Earnings Quality

Chief accountants weigh in: How professional leadership of SOEs influence investment efficiency