Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine whether managerial ability affects the quality of corporate environmental financial disclosures. Design/methodology/approach Regression analysis is used to examine the association between managerial ability and the quality of corporate environmental financial disclosures. Findings The results of primary empirical tests find a negative association between projection errors of corporate environmental capital expenditures and managerial ability. Overall results suggest that (1) managers appear to be equally capable of making relatively accurate projections of total corporate capital expenditures, and (2) managers with higher managerial ability are capable of estimating the projection amounts that appear to be significant, yet do not deviate substantially to what they intend to spend in the subsequent year(s) for legitimation purposes. Research limitations/implications The data collected and analyzed include only publicly traded companies in the environmentally sensitive industries in the USA; therefore, the results should not be generalized to non-US listed, private and non-publicly traded businesses. Practical implications Results of this study provide practical implications for stakeholders in their decision-making. For instance, understanding how different levels of managerial ability affect corporate environmental disclosures quality assists the board of directors in their evaluations of the performance of current top management. Furthermore, when contemplating new laws, governmental agencies and legislators can consider how managerial ability might affect the likelihood of environmentally sensitive businesses to comply with full disclosure and other reporting requirements. Social implications Information regarding top management’s ability to carry out socially acceptable environmental practices is very valuable for investors who are interested in socially responsible and green investing. Originality/value This study contributes to and links between two research streams: managerial ability in management literature and environmental financial disclosure literature. This is the first study that empirically tests whether the managerial ability is a determinant of the quality of corporate environmental financial disclosures.

Managerial Academic Experience, External Monitoring And Financial Reporting Quality

Short Selling and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Chinese AH Shares

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Measuring The Management Of Cash Flows From Operating Activities-Evidence From Chinese Capital Markets

Do Professional Managers Concern Their Market Reputation——An Evidence from Fraud Behaviors in China’s Securities Market

The Effect of Accounting Academics in the Boardroom on the Value Relevance of Financial Reporting Information

Can High Audit Quality Constrain Real Earnings Management

Can the academic experience of senior leadership improve corporate internal control quality?

Top Executives’ Ability and Earnings Quality: Evidence from the Chinese Capital Markets

Top Management Teams' Academic Experience and Firms' Corporate Social Responsibility Voluntary Disclosure

Worldwide Board Reforms and Financial Reporting Quality

The Consequences of Increasing the Scope of Managerial Judgement in Accounting Standards

Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings

Managerial myopia and audit fees: Evidence from China

Managerial Foreign Experience and Corporate Risk-Taking: Evidence from China

Imprinting Effect of Economic Conditions on CFOs' Judgment and Accounting Information Quality

Financial distress, internal control, and earnings management: Evidence from China

Audit services and financial reporting quality: The role of accounting expertise auditors

Does managerial ability affect the quality of environmental financial disclosure?

Municipal Accounting Restatements and Top Financial Manager Turnover

Accrual Anomaly,Earnings Quality and Stock Returns——Evidence from China