CSR transparency and firm value: Is the connection differential for cost leaders and differentiators?
Muath Abdelqader,Ali Uyar,Cemil Kuzey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141102
IF: 11.1
2024-02-15
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:Drawing on agency and disclosure theories, the study, for the first time, tests whether firm strategy predicts corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRR), a third-party assurance for corporate social responsibility reporting (CSRA), and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) adoption. Furthermore, we investigate whether firm strategy plays a role in the value-relevance of CSRR, CSRA, and GRI. The study is based on an international sample and the period between 2013 and 2019. The panel regression analysis indicates that while cost leadership strategy is positively associated with CSRR, CSRA, and GRI adoption, differentiation strategy is negatively associated with the adoption of all three CSRR practices. Furthermore, the moderation analysis revealed that cost leadership positively moderates between CSRR, CSRA, and GRI adoption and firm value but differentiation negatively moderates between those three CSRR practices and firm value. This implies that while shareholders approve of the CSRR practices of cost leaders, they disapprove of differentiators' CSRR practices. We suggest theoretical and practical implications in line with agency theory, resource-based view approach, and disclosure theory in the conclusion.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental