NonlinearU(j) Dependence Determined Directly from Low-Electric-fielde-jscurves Inyba

Hai‐Hu Wen,Zhongxian Zhao,R. J. Wijngaarden,J.H. Rector,B. Dam,R. Griessen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.52.4583
1995-01-01
Abstract:Low-electric-field E-${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{s}}$ curves, normalized dynamical relaxation rate Q(T)=d ln(${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{s}}$)/d ln(E), and experimental critical current density ${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{s}}$(E=${\mathit{E}}_{\mathit{c}}$) were measured from 10 to 85 K with the magnetic sweeping method. By taking a general assumption for the activation energy U(${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{s}}$,T)=${\mathit{U}}_{\mathit{c}}$(T)f[${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{s}}$(T)/${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{c}}$(T)], with t=T/${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{c}}$, we obtained the U(j,T=0 K) relation by scaling all the E-${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{s}}$ curves of different temperatures to one smooth curve with ${\mathit{U}}_{\mathit{c}}$(T) and ${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{c}}$(T) determined by the so-called generalized inversion scheme. It is shown that the important parameter c=ln(${\mathit{v}}_{0}$B), which was actually taken as a fitting parameter in the scaling process in previous work, can be predetermined. It is also found that the resulting U(j,T=0 K) relation based on the E-${\mathit{j}}_{\mathit{s}}$ curves for T\ensuremath{\le}79 K can be well interpreted with the collective-pinning model. However, the data for T>79 K start to deviate from this interpretation, which may be attributed to the reverse hopping of vortices.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?