Precarious Liability: the High Court in Lepore, Samin and Rich on School Responsibility for Assaults by Teachers

Steven White,Graeme Orr

2003-01-01

Abstract:In these three cases, heard together, the High Court considered the basis, if any, on which liability for (in particular, sexual) assaults by teachers could be attributed to educational authorities. A strong majority held that, where the teacher was an employee, only vicarious liability is available. Clear sceptical signals were sent to plaintiffs seeking to rely on vicarious liability, although several judgments do countenance such liability if the assault is characterisable as ‘excessive’ disciplinary chastisement. The traditional ‘course of employment’ test may, in line with UK and Canadian authority, be shifting to a ‘sufficiently close connection to the employment’ test — though whether this will be any broader in practice remains to be seen. The judgments also reveal scepticism about non-delegable duties (NDDs). Indeed, two judges explicitly hold that NDDs cannot extend to intentional torts, a finding that re-introduces arbitrary distinctions between victims seeking effective redress. Overall, the cases reinforce the conservative trend in the court's tort jurisprudence, yet fail to provide much doctrinal certainty for either child assault victims or the schooling system. This note concludes by suggesting two options for a fairer approach. Either State authorities should move to oust common law and install a tailored, administrative system to deal with claims in this sensitive area; or the common law could creatively borrow an exacting ‘all reasonable steps’ defence from anti-discrimination legislation.