Rights-protectors or rights-violators? Deconstructing teacher discrimination against LGBT students in England and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as an advocacy tool

Nomisha Kurian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1697680
2019-12-17
The International Journal of Human Rights
Abstract:For LGBT students in England, a curious contradiction exists between policy and practice. Within government policy, teachers have been discursively constructed as protectors and defenders of students' rights. Yet, within everyday schooling, teachers might perpetuate or enable discrimination themselves. In order to explore this tension, this article creates four categories to deconstruct different motivations for, and manifestations of, teacher discrimination: 'unaware' teachers, 'apathetic' teachers, 'reluctant' teachers and 'prejudiced' teachers. It interrogates how ignorance, apathy, reluctance and prejudice become imbricated in complex social, historical and political legacies of identity erasure, normalised violence and moral discourses of young people's welfare and desexualised innocence. Seeking to apply international human rights law to the best of its (imperfect and ever-evolving) capacity, the article then evaluates how each category of teacher discrimination might be addressed by the text and jurisprudence of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). The goals of the article extend beyond the British context: to generate new analytical tools for conceptualising and differentiating between diverse types of teacher discrimination and to utilise human rights frameworks in advocating for more inclusive classrooms.
law
What problem does this paper attempt to address?