Abstract:Recent case law in the UK courts has established the possibility for the parent companies of multinational corporations (MNCs) to hold liability in tort negligence for harms caused by their foreign-based subsidiaries. The UK’s approach – a general duty of care for cross-border torts – is noteworthy in that it has developed organically through the common law despite conflicting with established principles of company law. By comparison, European neighbours such as France, Switzerland and Germany have developed statutory regulatory regimes which utilize due diligence obligations that appear more reflective of recent international accountability standards, such as the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) of the late John Ruggie. This work serves as an in-depth investigation for scholars of tort law, company law, private international law and human rights, who are interested in understanding this rapidly developing area of practice from an English perspective. This work is offered in two parts. This first part contextualizes the current law within contemporary academic discourse and offers a historically informed explanation for the conceptual underpinnings of the unique approach currently taken within English jurisprudence and their coherence with the broader principles of domestic UK company law. The second part offers an analysis of UK law as it stands including the caselaw that builds the corpus of parent company liability in England and Wales. It analyses how effective the current liabilities identified by the Courts are in securing fair remedy for corporate misfeasance. It identifies and categorizes its key features and contrasts them with comparative elements of statutory due diligence approaches adopted by France and Germany or pursued as in the case of Switzerland. It will finally consider whether they offer any concepts worthy of consideration for the regulation of parent company liabilities in future. Parent Company, Corporate Groups, English Company Law, Human Rights Due Diligence, UNGPs, Okpabi, Vedanta, Mass Torts, Supply Chain Liability, Limited Liability

Accident Compensation Liability Without Fault- the New Zealand Experience

New Developments of Fault Liability Principle in Modern Tort Law

Private international law and substantive liability issues in tort litigation against multinational companies in the English courts: recent UK Supreme Court decisions and post-Brexit implications

Parental Corporate Liability as Tort in the United Kingdom Part I: How the Past Informs the Challenge of Contemporary Regulation

The Study of the Subject of Automobile Liability

Guardians' Assumption of Torts Liability

The Relationship and Development Tendency between Liability Insurance and Tort law

Reconstructing Dual Liability Imputation System of Tort Law:Risk Domain Theory

Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws

The Public Life of Private Law: Tort Law as a Risk Regulation Mechanism

Liability rules can rationalize greater victim vulnerability

A Study On The Liability Of Transnational Environmental Harm

Analysis of Compensation System Preferences: Limitations of the Current Insurance System and Proposals for Improvement

CIVIL TORT LAWSUIT AGAINST TRAFFIC ACCIDENT CASES

From domestic to global? Recent trends in environmental liability from a multilevel and comparative law perspective

The Evolution of Tort Act Imputation Principle

An Introduction to Choice No-Fault

Autonomous Cars and Tort Liability

Distinctive Judicial-Tailored Causation References of Construction Accidents

On the Tort Liability of the High Toss Act

TRENDS IN TORT LIABILITY FOR STATE DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION. ADMINISTRATIVE SUBCOMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATION