Abstract:The position of objective imputation is concerned with the nature of constitutive requirements. This article discusses this problem in the context of the substantialization of constitutive requirements. Objective imputation and causation are two totally different concepts. Causation is committed to the issue of attribution, while objective imputation is concerned with blamefulness. Thus objective imputation is parallel to causation and should be coped with by substantially examining the constitutive requirements after solving the issue of causation. Moreover, the thinking methods of causation and objective imputation are different. The issue of causation only focuses on the relationship between act and consequence, so before determining whether causation exists or not, we should first examine whether the act and the consequence exist or not. This kind of sepration can not examine the constitutive requirements substantially in some instances. In this aspect, objective imputation carries out a substantializing exanimation of act and consequence, thus goes beyond the bounds of causation and comes into the scope of blamefulness. There is no hierarchy in the "Four Elements" theory in Chinese criminal law. Although the "Four Elements" theory contains a substantial examination criterion, i. e., the theory of harmfulness to society, this criterion has not been included into the analytic scheme of crime as a constitutive element, and is kept away from even overtops the analytic scheme of crime. There exist three theoretical obstacles to introduce objective imputation into Chinese criminal law under contemporary circumstances, that is, the insurmountable contradiction between objective imputation and harmfulness to society, the insuperable conflict between objective imputation and causation, and the unavoidable inconsistency between objective imputation and the "Four Elements" theory. Only by abandoning the "Four Elements" theory and introducing the "Tripartite Scheme" theory as the analytic scheme of crime can objective imputation theory survive in Chinese criminal law.

The Evolution of Tort Act Imputation Principle

New Developments of Fault Liability Principle in Modern Tort Law

On the Arrangement of the Imputation Principle of Medical Tort

The Development of Seller's Defect Warranty Liability in German Law and Its Enlightenment to China

On the Relationship between Imputing Principles and Types of Tort Liability

Reconstructing Dual Liability Imputation System of Tort Law:Risk Domain Theory

Reconstruction of Constituent Elements Theory of Tort by Interpretation

The Relationship and Development Tendency between Liability Insurance and Tort law

On Methods of Bearing Tort Liability

On the Tort Liability of the High Toss Act

Liability Princpile and Liability Premise:Comments on Torts Law Draft

Socialization of Tort Law——Focus on the Relationship between Tort Law and Insurance

An Exploration of the Problems with the User's Liability

On the Civil Interests Protected by Tort Liability Law

Systematic Position of Objective Imputation

Analysis of Tort Liability of Personality Rights under the Network Environment

Background and Key Contents of the New Chinese Tort Liability Law

A Positive Analysis of the Criterion of State Compensatory Liability

Methodological Thinking on Formulating the Responsibility of Tort Law

The Principle of Culpability and Foreseeablity in Negligent Crime

Guardians' Assumption of Torts Liability