Corporate Governance when Founders Are Directors

Feng Li,Suraj Srinivasan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1445201
2009-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:We examine the role of founders as directors by examining CEO compensation, CEO retention policies, and M&A decisions in firms where founders serve as a director with a non-founder CEO (founder-director firms). We find that founder-director firms offer a different mix of incentives to their CEOs than other firms. Pay for performance sensitivity for non-founder CEOs in founder-director firms is almost twice and the level of pay is significantly lower than that of CEOs in non-founder firms. CEO turnover sensitivity to firm performance is also significantly higher. CEOs of founder-director firms are 85% more likely to be replaced than CEOs of non-founder firms for a decline from the top to the bottom decile in performance. Overall, the evidence suggests that boards with founder-directors provide more high powered incentives in the form of pay and retention policies than the average U.S. board. Stock returns around M&A announcements are also higher in founder-director firms compared to non-founder firms. Finally, directors appear to be more diligent in founder-director companies. Non-founder board members in founder-director firms have a better board meeting attendance record than directors in other firms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?