Abstract:In a series of papers Holmstrom, Milgrom and Roberts have argued that incentives for agents tend to be complementary under certain conditions. A growing body of empirical literature also appears to support this notion. Data constraints, however, have limited the studies to some particular industries or to a selective few aspects in agency contracts. This paper examines the complementarity and substitutability of CEO incentives of more than 300 Chinese state-owned enterprises from a panel data set. The data contain rich information about CEO pay sensitivity; whether the CEO posted performance bond; managerial discretion in production, in employee wage discretion, share of output to sell to the market (versus being required to deliver to the state at lower price); and contract duration. In explaining the interaction of incentives, we extend the framework of Holmstrom and Milgrom (1994) to accommodate the case of multiple signals for the manager's effort for each task. We classify the various incentive instruments into three tasks of CEOs: to pursue current financial performance, to invest for future financial performance, and to work on other activities that yield private benefits. The model then suggests that these three incentive indices should be complementary, and the individual incentives within an incentive index should be substitutes. Our empirical examination confirms these predictions. A side product of getting the conditional correlations is to be able to examine the determinants of the three incentive indices. We find that the determination of CEO incentives for current performance is consistent with the risk-incentive tradeoff hypothesis. The determination of managerial discretion is consistent with the incomplete contract literature that control rights should be matched with the party with superior information and ability. There is also evidence that the government uses contract duration to elicit information.

On the Director Compensation, CEO Compensation and Firm's Performance

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Excessive Incentive and Corporate Performance: Research Based on Marginal Diminishing Effect and Top Management Team of Chinese Listed Companies

Top executive pay and firm performance in China

Performance Evaluation Mechanism and CEO Turnover——Evidence Based on Different Ultimate Ownership in China's Lasted Firms

Determinants of Executive Compensation: Empirical Research on Listed-Company in China

Corporate Performance Based on Single-index Semi-parametric Methods

Board Leadership Structure and Corporate Governance—Evidence from CEO Turnovers in China' s Listed Firms

Complementarity and Substitutability of CEO Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Political Promotion, CEO Incentives, and the Relationship Between Pay and Performance

The Correlation Analysis Between the Performance of China Public Companies and the High Level Executives' Compensation

An Empirical Study Of The Effects Of Corporate Performance On Managerial Compensation Based On China'S Listed Companies

CEO Overpayment and Dismissal: the Role of Attribution and Attention

A Study of Executive Compensation Incentives and Firm Performance

Research on the Influence of Executive Compensation Incentive on Corporate Financial Performance under the Multiple Regulation of Corporate Governance

A Study on the Influence of Executive Compensation Incentives on Corporate Performance

Does Independence of the Board Affect Firm Performance?

Do all CEO pay regulations hurt firm performance? Evidence from China

Research on the Correlation Between CFO and CEO's Compensation——Based on the Data of 946 Listed Companies in Chinese Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Market

Compensation peer effects of corporate social responsibility

The Effect of Compensation Committee on CEO Compensation Contracts: Evidence from China