Abstract:In a series of papers Holmstrom, Milgrom and Roberts have argued that incentives for agents tend to be complementary under certain conditions. A growing body of empirical literature also appears to support this notion. Data constraints, however, have limited the studies to some particular industries or to a selective few aspects in agency contracts. This paper examines the complementarity and substitutability of CEO incentives of more than 300 Chinese state-owned enterprises from a panel data set. The data contain rich information about CEO pay sensitivity; whether the CEO posted performance bond; managerial discretion in production, in employee wage discretion, share of output to sell to the market (versus being required to deliver to the state at lower price); and contract duration. In explaining the interaction of incentives, we extend the framework of Holmstrom and Milgrom (1994) to accommodate the case of multiple signals for the manager's effort for each task. We classify the various incentive instruments into three tasks of CEOs: to pursue current financial performance, to invest for future financial performance, and to work on other activities that yield private benefits. The model then suggests that these three incentive indices should be complementary, and the individual incentives within an incentive index should be substitutes. Our empirical examination confirms these predictions. A side product of getting the conditional correlations is to be able to examine the determinants of the three incentive indices. We find that the determination of CEO incentives for current performance is consistent with the risk-incentive tradeoff hypothesis. The determination of managerial discretion is consistent with the incomplete contract literature that control rights should be matched with the party with superior information and ability. There is also evidence that the government uses contract duration to elicit information.

Political Promotion, CEO Incentives, and the Relationship Between Pay and Performance

Political Promotion Incentives and Within-Firm Pay Gap: Evidence from China

The Dark Side of Political Promotion Incentives: Evidence from Firm Performance

Political Capital Vs. Constraint: Evidence from CEO Turnovers in Chinese Private Firms

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Do CEO's political promotion incentives influence the value of cash holdings: Evidence from state-owned enterprises in China

Political Capital and CEO Entrenchment: Evidence from CEO Turnover in Chinese Non-Soes

Compensation regulation and political promotion of executives of state-owned enterprises——Quasi-natural experiment based on the reform of compensation regulation in China

Political ranks, incentives and firm performance

Complementarity and Substitutability of CEO Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Operating Risk, Promotion Incentive and Corporate Performance

Political Turnover and Economic Performance: the Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China

Incentive Pay and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China

Political Connections and Agency Conflicts: the Roles of Owner and Manager Political Influence on Executive Compensation

Does executives' political identity improve firm financial performance? Evidence from China

Top executive pay and firm performance in China

Political Motivation, Over-Investment, and Firm Performance

On the Director Compensation, CEO Compensation and Firm's Performance

Excessive Incentive and Corporate Performance: Research Based on Marginal Diminishing Effect and Top Management Team of Chinese Listed Companies

Political power differential and forced CEO turnover: Evidence from Chinese non‐state‐owned enterprises

Political Connections, Compensation Incentive,and Employee Allocation Efficiency