Abstract:We examine which of two opposing financial reporting incentives that group-affiliated firms experience shapes their accounting transparency evident in auditor choice. In one direction, complex group structure and intra-group transactions enable controlling shareholders to pursue diversionary activities that they later hide by distorting reported earnings. In the other direction, as outside investors price protect against potential expropriation, controlling shareholders may be eager to improve financial reporting quality in order to alleviate agency costs. To empirically clarify whether group affiliation affects company insiders’ incentives to address minority shareholders’ concerns over agency costs, we examine auditor selection of group firms relative to stand-alone firms. In comparison to non-group firms, our evidence implies that group firms are more likely to appoint Top 10 audit firms in China, especially when their controlling shareholders have stronger incentives to improve external monitoring of the financial reporting process. After isolating group firms, we find that the presence of a Top 10 auditor translates into higher earnings and disclosure quality, higher valuation implications for related-party transactions, and cheaper equity financing, implying that these firms benefit from engaging a high-quality auditor. In additional analysis consistent with our predictions, we find that group firms that are Top 10 clients pay higher audit fees and their controlling shareholders are more constrained against meeting earnings benchmarks through intra-group transactions and siphoning corporate resources at the expense of minority investors. Collectively, our evidence supports the narrative that insiders in firms belonging to business groups weigh the costs and benefits stemming from auditor choice.

Voluntary Interim Audit and Agency Costs Between Management and Shareholders: the China Experience

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Can Voluntary Interim Auditing Reduce Earnings Management?——An empirical test of a self-selection model

Can Mandatory Dual Audit Reduce the Cost of Equity? Evidence from China

Audit Quality and Owner-Manager Agency Costs: Evidence from China

Agency Cost of Government Ownership: A Study of Voluntary Audit Committee Formation in China

Internal Control,Audit Quality and Agency Cost

The Voluntary Adoption of an Audit Committee and Earnings Quality: Evidence from China

Do Audit Committees Reduce the Agency Costs of Ownership Structure?

Buy, Lie, or Die: an Investigation of Chinese ST Firms’ Voluntary Interim Audit Motive and Auditor Independence

Agency Costs and Corporate Voluntary Disclosure

Corporate Governance Causes of the Voluntary Audit Behaviour of Interim Financial Reporting of Public Listed Companies——Some Evidences from Shenzhen Stock Exchange

Ownership Structure,Agency Cost and External Auditing Demand

Cai, Charlie X. and Hillier, David and Tian, Gaoliang and Wu, Qinghua (2015) Do audit committees reduce the agency costs of ownership

The Effect of Voluntary Internal Control Audits on the Cost of Capital

Managerial myopia and audit fees: Evidence from China

A study on audit fees decision making: Evidence from China Stock Market

Auditor Choice and Its Implications for Group-Affiliated Firms