Effects of long-term right ventricular apex pacing on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function
Man-Kun Xin,Peng Gao,Shu-Yang Zhang,Man-kun Xin,peng Gao,Shu-yang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.042
IF: 4.039
2021-05-01
International Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p>Right ventricular apex (RVA) is still the most common implanted site in the world. There are a large number of RVA pacing population who have been carrying dual-chamber permanent pacemaker (PPM) over decades. Comparison of left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function between RVA pacing population and healthy population is unknown.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Method</h3><p>This case-control study enrolled 61 patients suffered from complete atrioventricular block (III°AVB) for replacement of dual-chamber PPM. Then, 61 healthy controls matched with PPM patients in gender, age, follow-up duration and complications were included. The lead impedance, pacing threshold and sensing were compared between at implantation and long-term follow-up. Left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function were compared between RVA pacing population (RVA group) and healthy population (healthy group) at implantation (baseline) and follow-up. And clarify the predictors of LV systolic function in RVA group at follow-up.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>After 112.44 ± 34.94 months of follow-up, comparing with parameters at implantation, atrial lead impedance decreased significantly (690 ± 2397 Ω vs 613 ± 2257 Ω, <em>p</em> = 0.048); atrial pacing threshold has a increased trend and P-wave amplitude has a decreased trend, but there was no statistical differences; while, RVA ventricular lead threshold increased significantly (0.50 ± 0.23 V vs 0.91 ± 0.47 V, <em>p</em> < 0.001), impedance (902 ± 397 Ω vs 680 ± 257 Ω,<em>p</em> < 0.001) and R-wave amplitude (11.71 ± 9.40mv vs 7.00 ± 6.91 mv, <em>p</em> < 0.001) decreased significantly. Compared with healthy group, long-term RVA pacing significantly increased ventricular dyssynchrony (mean QRS duration, 156.21 ± 29.80 ms vs 97.08 ± 15.70 ms, <em>p</em> < 0.001), left atrium diameter (LAD, 40.61 ± 6.15 mm vs 37.49 ± 4.80 mm,<em>p</em> = 0.002), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD, 49.15 ± 5.93 mm vs 46.41 ± 3.80 mm,<em>p</em> = 0.003), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVMI, 121.86 ± 41.52 g/m2 vs 98.41 ± 25.29 g/m2,<em>p</em> < 0.001), significantly deteriorated degree of tricuspid regurgitation (<em>p</em> < 0.001), and significantly decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 61.38 ± 8.10% vs 64.64 ± 5.85%, <em>p</em> = 0.012), but after long-term RVA pacing, the mean LVEF was still more than 50%. Long-term RVA group LVEF was negatively correlated with preimplantation LVMI (B = -0.055,<em>t</em> = −2.244,<em>p</em> = 0.029), LVMI at follow-up (B = −0.081,<em>t</em> = −3.864,<em>p</em> = 0.000) and tricuspid regurgitation at follow-up (B = −3.797,<em>t</em> = −3.599,<em>p</em> = 0.001).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>In conclusion, although long-term RVA pacing has significantly effects on left ventricular dyssynchrony, morphology and systolic function in III°AVB patients, the mean LVEF is still >50%. High preimplantation LVMI can predict the decline of LVEF.</p>
cardiac & cardiovascular systems