Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To study differences of multifidus muscle injury between Wiltse intermuscular approach and intramuscular stripping approach in one-level small incision transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery.METHODS:A total of 46 patients with unilateral lumbar degenerative disease underwent small incision TLIF from August 2009 to February 2011 by one group of surgeons at a single institution. The decompression side of all patients adopted intra-muscular stripping approach; for the non-decompression side, 22 patients adopted Wiltse intermuscular approach (group A),and 24 patients adopted intra-muscular striping approach (group B). In group A, there were 13 males and 9 females, ranging in age from 36 to 74 years old,averaged 52.7 +/- 9.2; 1 patient had disease in L3, 4 12 in L4,5 and 9 in L5S1. In group B,there were 11 males and 13 females,ranging in age from 32 tio 72 years old, averaged 51.8 +/- 8.7; two patients had disease in L3,4, 14 in L4,5, and 8 in L5S1. The following data were compared between the 2 groups: surgical time from skin incision to completion of pedicle screw placement, suturation time, blood loss. Clinical effects were evaluated by VAS score pre-operatively, as well as 1, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. At the latest follow-up, all the patients were evaluated by MRI. This enabled the cross-sectional area (CSA) of lean multifidus muscle, and the T2 signal intensity ratio of multifidus to psoas muscle, to be compared at the operative level.RESULTS:There was no obvious difference in suturation time, but less surgical time from skin incision to completion of pedicle screw placement, less blood loss, less postoperative back pain in Wiltse intermuscular approach group. For the comparison between the two groups or paired comparison between sides in the Wiltse group, the reduction of lean CSA and increase in the multifidus:psoas T2 signal intensity ratio were all significant lower in Wiltse intermuscular approach group or side.CONCLUSION:The Wiltse intermuscular approach is an easy way for pedicle screw placement, and caused less paraspinal muscle damage than intra-muscular stripping approach, and had positive effects on less back pain.

Biomechanical Effects of Iatrogenic Muscle-Ligaments Complex Damage on Adjacent Segments Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Biomechanical effect of proximal multifidus injury on adjacent segments during posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study

Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a finite element analysis

Preserving Posterior Complex Can Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries: A Finite Element Analysis

[Case-Control Study on Effects of Two Approaches on Multifidus Muscle Injuries During Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Lumbar Vertebrae].

Biomechanical Study of Proximal Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Fixation: a Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical Effects of Osteoporosis on Adjacent Segments after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study.

Biomechanical Analysis of Adjacent Segments after Spinal Fusion Surgery Using a Geometrically Parametric Patient-Specific Finite Element Model

Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis

Biomechanical Comparison of Laminectomy, Hemilaminectomy and A New Minimally Invasive Approach in the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Intradural Tumour: A Finite Element Analysis

Adjacent segments biomechanics following lumbar fusion surgery: a musculoskeletal finite element model study

Multifidus Muscle Changes and Clinical Effects of One-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Minimally Invasive Procedure Versus Conventional Open Approach

Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation

Finite Element Analysis of the Influence of Different Posterior Fixations of Two-level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Adjacent Segmental Degeneration

Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.

Biomechanical effects of lumbar fusion surgery on adjacent segments using musculoskeletal models of the intact, degenerated and fused spine

Finite Element Modeling for Biomechanical Comparisons of Multilevel Transforaminal, Posterior, and Lateral Lumbar Approaches to Interbody Fusion Augmented with Posterior Instrumentation

Effects of different lumbar fusion modes on lumbar spine biomechanics

Comparison of Posterior Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Finite Element Analysis

Effect of Lumbar Lordosis on the Adjacent Segment in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Biomechanical Analysis of Lumbar Fusion with Proximal Interspinous Process Device Implantation