Abstract:Background and objective: The current trend of laminoplasty is developing toward the goal of muscle preservation and minimum tissue damage. Given this, muscle-preserving techniques in cervical single-door laminoplasty have been modified with protecting the spinous processes at the sites of C2 and/or C7 muscle attachment and reconstruct the posterior musculature in recent years. To date, no study has reported the effect of preserving the posterior musculature during the reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the biomechanical effect of multiple modified single-door laminoplasty procedures for restoring stability and reducing response level on the cervical spine. Methods: Different cervical laminoplasty models were established for evaluating kinematics and response simulations based on a detailed finite element (FE) head-neck active model (HNAM), including (1) C3 - C7 laminoplasty (LP_C37), (2) C3 - C6 laminoplasty with C7 spinous process preservation (LP_C36), (3) C3 laminectomy hybrid decompression with C4 - C6 laminoplasty (LT_C3 + LP_C46) and (4) C3 - C7 laminoplasty with unilateral musculature preservation (LP_C37 + UMP). The laminoplasty model was validated by the global range of motion (ROM) and percentage changes relative to the intact state. The C2 - T1 ROM, axial muscle tensile force, and stress/strain levels of functional spinal units were compared among the different laminoplasty groups. The obtained effects were further analysed by comparison with a review of clinical data on cervical laminoplasty scenarios. Results: Analysis of the locations of concentration of muscle load showed that the C2 muscle attachment sustained more tensile loading than the C7 muscle attachment, primarily in flexion-extension (FE) and in lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR), respectively. Simulated results further quantified that LP_C36 primarily produced 10% decreases in LB and AR modes relative to LP_C37. Compared with LP_C36, LT_C3 + LP_C46 resulted in approximately 30% decreases in FE motion; LP C37 + UMP also showed a similar trend. Additionally, when compared to LP_C37, LT_C3 + LP_C46 and LP C37 + UMP reduced the peak stress level at the intervertebral disc by at most 2-fold as well as the peak strain level of the facet joint capsule by 2-3-fold. All these findings were well correlated with the result of clinical studies comparing modified laminoplasty and classic laminoplasty. Conclusions: Modified muscle-preserving laminoplasty is superior to classic laminoplasty due to the biomechanical effect of the posterior musculature reconstruction, with a retained postoperative ROM and loading response levels of the functional spinal units. More motion-sparing is beneficial for increasing cervical stability, which probably accelerates the recovery of postoperative neck movement and reduces the risk of the complication for eventual kyphosis and axial pain. Surgeons are encouraged to make every effort to preserve the attachment of the C2 whenever feasible in laminoplasty. (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Biomechanical Comparison of Laminectomy, Hemilaminectomy and A New Minimally Invasive Approach in the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Intradural Tumour: A Finite Element Analysis

Unilateral multilevel interlaminar fenestration: a minimally invasive approach for cervical intramedullary lesions.

Unilateral, Multilevel, Interlaminar Fenestration in the Removal of a Multisegment Cervical Intramedullary Ependymoma

Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Characteristics After Different Minimally Invasive Surgeries for Cervical Spondylopathy: A Finite Element Analysis

Minimally Invasive Microsurgical Treatment of Cervical Intraspinal Extramedullary Tumors

Biomechanical Effects of Intersegmental Stability Due to Multilevel Cervical Laminectomy

A Finite Element Analysis of the Effects of Different Internal Fixation Strategies and Cage Implantation Methods on the Biomechanics of the Lumbar Spine

Finite Element Analysis of a Novel Fusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Biomechanical Comparison of 1-Level Corpectomy and 2-Level Discectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Finite Element Analysis.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Two Fusion Techniques Based on Finite Element Analysis: Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Biomechanical Effect of Posterior Ligament Repair in Lamina Repair Surgery.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Vitro

Finite Element Modeling for Biomechanical Comparisons of Multilevel Transforaminal, Posterior, and Lateral Lumbar Approaches to Interbody Fusion Augmented with Posterior Instrumentation

Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis

Biomechanical Comparison of Different Surgical Strategies for Skip-level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: A Finite Element Study

Quantitatively Biomechanical Response Analysis of Posterior Musculature Reconstruction in Cervical Single-Door Laminoplasty.

Minimally Invasive Removal of Lumbar Intradural Extramedullary Lesions Using the Interlaminar Approach

Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy Decompression and Fusion, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, and Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion in the Surgical Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation

Biomechanics Changes of Lumbar Spine Caused by Foraminotomy Via Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Biomechanical response of decompression alone in lower grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis--A finite element analysis