Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 3 kinds of lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF,PLIF,TLIF) for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis at L4.5 and L5S1 levels.Methods Data of seventy patients with lowgrade isthmic spondylolisthesis who had undergone different lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) procedures according to the assessment of the clinical manifestation,neurological symptoms,plane of the common iliac vessels and the width of "vascular window" by three-dimensional computed tomography angiography between May 2004 and May 2014 were retrospectively reviewed.21 patients had undergone anterior LIF (ALIF)(13 males and 8 females with an average of 43.29±8.15 years old (range,29-53 years old);L4,5 in ten,L5S1 in 11;Meyerding grade Ⅰ 10 cases,grade Ⅱ 11 cases);25 patients had undergone posterior LIF (PLIF) (12 males and 13 females,with an average of 44.04±12.71 years old (range,25-64 years old);L4.5 in 12,L5S1 in 13;Meyerding grade Ⅰ 15 cases,grade Ⅱ 10 cases) and 24 patients had undergone transforaminal LIF (TLIF) (12 males and 12 females with an average of 45.00± 9.36 years old (range,34-62 years old);L4,5 in 12,L5S1 in 12;Meyerding grade Ⅰ 11 cases,grade Ⅱ 13 cases).Results All patients were followed up for 24-37 months (average,25.6±8.7 months).The visual analogue scale (VAS) in all groups were decreased from 7.05±0.87 (ALIF),6.60±1.39 (PLIF),6.75±1.11 (TLIF) pre-operation to 0.90±0.70,0.96±0.68,1.04±0.62 24 months after operation.Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were decreased from 78.53％±6.25％,79.80％±6.55％,79.92％±8.10％ preoperation to 17.14％±3.01％,21.32％±4.40％,22.46％±3.87％.Perioperative data including operation time,blood loss,postoperative blood drainage,length of stay showed no significant difference between ALIF group and TLIF group,but showing significant difference comparing with PLIF group.The imageological results showed that ALIF procedure increased whole lumbar lordosis (WL) and disc height (DH),showing no significant difference comparing with PLIF group,but showing significant difference comparing with TLIF group.The ALIF procedure increased segmental lordosis angle (SL),showing significant difference comparing with PLIF group and TLIF group.The PLIF procedure decreased spondylolisthesis index (SI),showing significant difference comparing with A/TLIF group,but showing no significant difference between ALIF group and TLIF group.There was no significant difference showed comparing the L1 axis S1 distance (LASD) and sacral slope (SS),in three groups.The graft fusion was achieved in all patients after 6-8 months postoperatively without instrument failure or displacement.Conclusion Three surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis showed silimar clinical efficacy.The ALIF procedure is superior in its capacity to restore WL,DH,and SL,and the P/TLIF procedure are superior in correcting the vertebral slippage and spinal cord decompression.

Effects of different lumbar fusion modes on lumbar spine biomechanics

In Vitro Study of Biomechanical Analysis of Modified Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion—crenel Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Topping-off surgery vs posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a finite element analysis

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Surgical Procedures in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Vitro

Effects of dynamic and rigid implantation on biomechanical characteristics of different sagittal alignment lumbar after single- or double-level spinal fixations: a finite-element modeling study

Comparison of the Effect of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Pedicle Screw Fixation and Interspinous Fixation on the Stiffness of Adjacent Segments

Comparative study of three surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis

Biomechanical effects of lumbar fusion surgery on adjacent segments using musculoskeletal models of the intact, degenerated and fused spine

Biomechanical properties of a novel nonfusion artificial vertebral body for anterior lumbar vertebra resection and internal fixation

Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation

Biomechanical Analysis of Adjacent Segments after Spinal Fusion Surgery Using a Geometrically Parametric Patient-Specific Finite Element Model

Preserving Posterior Complex Can Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgeries: A Finite Element Analysis

Effect of Lumbar Lordosis on the Adjacent Segment in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Various Fixation Options: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions.

Cadaveric biomechanical analysis of multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion with and without supplemental instrumentation

Effect of Lumbar Fusion in Different Sagittal Alignments on the Adjacent Intradiscal Pressure

Finite Element Modeling for Biomechanical Comparisons of Multilevel Transforaminal, Posterior, and Lateral Lumbar Approaches to Interbody Fusion Augmented with Posterior Instrumentation

Biomechanical Study of Proximal Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Fixation: a Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical and Clinical Study of Rod Curvature in Single-Segment Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Biomechanical Analysis of Lumbar Fusion with Proximal Interspinous Process Device Implantation

Biomechanical Evaluation of Four Surgical Scenarios of Lumbar Fusion with Hyperlordotic Interbody Cage: A Finite Element Study