Identification of mode I fracture toughness in GFRP/Al and GFRP/Cu joints for structural batteries

Maryam Niazi,Federico Danzi,Ricardo Carbas,Pedro P. Camanho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118509
IF: 6.3
2024-08-27
Composite Structures
Abstract:Fibre metal laminates (FMLs) have been proposed as components of structural batteries, yet their elastic mismatch can lead to interface cracks, compromising structural integrity and both mechanical and electrochemical efficiency. To this end, the bonding between the metal and the composite layer is of utmost importance. In this study, the effect of various metal surface treatments on the mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of two FML configurations suitable for structural batteries—Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)/aluminum laminate and GFRP/copper laminate—was examined. The surface treatments included sulfo-ferric etching, NaOH/HNO 3 etching, and Sol-Gel anodizing for aluminum 2024-T3, as well as FeCl 3 /HCl/Glycerol treatment and Sol-Gel anodizing for copper alloy. The results were compared with untreated conditions and with the baseline GFRP/GFRP configuration. GFRP/metal coupons were designed to achieve pure mode I interlaminar fracture toughness in double cantilever beam (DCB) tests, and the designs were verified using the Virtual Crack Closure Technique (VCCT). The surface characterization of the metals was performed using contact angle tests to estimate the surface free energy, while Coherence Scanning Interferometry (CSI) was used to measure the surface roughness and topography.
mechanics,materials science, composites
What problem does this paper attempt to address?