Abstract:Academic creativity is a key part of contemporary Chinese cultural construction. The creation of Chinese School of comparative literature and the disciplinary theoretical formation across the world might be a typical example of academic creativity of the humanities and social sciences of China. The forming process of Chinese School of comparative literature is a creative process full of controversy in that since it was first proposed people have not agreed on its definition. The disagreement on the creation of Chinese School in fact is Eurocentric, which results in the dilemma of disciplinary "aphasia". In Europe it was with the strong disciplinary awareness that French School promoted the formation of its disciplinary system and its establishment. Therefore, the establishment of Chinese School of comparative literature is absolutely necessary, but the proposal for the establishment of Chinese School does not mean the fulfillment of academic creativity. We must come up with the ways to realize it. That Chinese School puts forward a number of themes such as "trans-cultural studies of the alien features", "cross-civilization", "aphasia", "studies of variation", the "foreignization of literature" as well as the "sinicization of Western literary theories" is the very way of academic creativity and also the concrete reflection of it. Academic creativity is fulfilled with the essence of both the West and the Chinese. We must find the foundation stone for academic creativity according to realistic basic issues with "I" as the subject. Meanwhile, we also should be creative with regard to academic methods. According to these statements, the author thinks that theoretical system of comparative literature of the third phase has been basically formed. The academic theoretical creativity of Chinese scholars is of great importance to comparative literature. In the meantime, there is much in their creative thinking and methods the humanities and social sciences could make use of.

From the Critical "Aphasia" to "the Rewriting of Civilization History": An Interview with Cao Shunqing

The Domestic Appropriation of Literary Theories and Chinesenization of Western Literary Theories

From "aphasia" to the Localization of Western Literary Critics in China--Second Thinking on Rebuilding the Chinese Literary Theory

Rewriting the History of Civilizations

On Aphasia of Chinese Cultural Study---When Adorno's Theory of Culture Industry Encounter with Chinese Experience

Chinese school: the theoretical construction of the third phase of comparative literature

Heterogeneity, Variation and Domestic Appropriation of Cross-civilization Literary Theories

A New Orientation in Chinese-Western Comparative Literature: From Homogeneity to Variation

The legitimacy of comparison between eastern and western literatures and proposal of comparative literary variation

Cross-civilization Studies:Keep Pace with the Orientation of the Academic World and the Academic Frontiers

The Academic Background and Theoretical Assumptions of the Theory of Variation of Comparative Literature

Cross-civilization Study: an Inevitable Trend

The Variation Theory of Comparative Literature and the Cross-Civilization Studies

Variation Theory:A Breakthrough in Theorizing Comparative Literature Studies

Reflections on Chinese as an Academic Discipline over the Past 70 Years

New Thoughts about the Theoretical System of Current Comparative Literature

Revealing the Missing Part of Contemporary Literary History:A Re-discussion of the Inclusion of Poetry in the Traditional Style in the Writing of Contemporary Chinese Literary History

Cross-civilization Study of Comparative Literature—The Turn and Construction of the Discipline Theory of Comparative Literature

New Vision and New Practice of the Impact Studies of Comparative Poetics

Legitimacy Debates and Identity Crisis——In the Case of "aphasia" in Chinese Modern Literary Theory and "westernization" of Chinese Modern Poetry

On "interpreting Chinese with Chinese Discourse"