Design and in vitro model evaluation of digital guides for crown lengthening surgery

李怡,刘明月,吕季喆,周建锋,谭建国,刘晓强
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115668-20221120-00246
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To classify and design the digital surgical guides for crown lengthening surgery (CLS), and evaluate the application effect of the digital guides.Methods:Individually designed maxillary models with altered passive eruption were prepared with a total of twenty. The models were divided into four groups ( n=5) : type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ, type Ⅲ, and control. Six anterior tooth CLS guides were computer-aided designed and manufactured for experimental groups. CLS was performed by the same surgeon with the free hand and the assistance of three types of digital guides. The operation time was recorded, and the third-party experts evaluated the operation effect. At the same time, different professional dentists were invited to conduct peer reviews on the application value of the three types of surgical guides. Results:In terms of surgical efficiency, the time of CG, T1G, T2G and T3G were (17.20±0.85) min, (10.56±1.14) min, (6.79±0.19) min and (5.78±0.36) min, respectively, and the differences among the four groups were statistically significant ( P<0.05). In terms of surgical effect, the morphology and position of gingival margin scores of the three guide plate groups were significantly higher than CG ( P<0.05), and the gingival margin curvature and symmetry scores of T3G were significantly higher than T1G and T2G ( P<0.05). In addition, the alveolar crest curvature, height and symmetry scores of T3G were significantly higher than those of the other groups ( P<0.05), while the scores of T1G and CG measured with the help of probe were significantly lower than those of the other groups ( P<0.05). In terms of application value, the scores of individual design, incision design and expected efficiency of the three digital guides were significantly better than CG ( P<0.05), and the scores of T3G were significantly better than those of T1G and T2G ( P<0.05) ; In terms of simplified surgery and expected effect, the scores from high to low were T3G, T2G, T1G and CG ( P<0.05) . Conclusion:The application effect of typeⅢ CLS guide is the best, type II guide is superior to type I guide, and the three digital guides are significantly better than free hand.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?