Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery (sCAIS) for tooth-supported free-end dental implantation with the aid/and without the aid of fixation pins to secure the surgical template through comparison between planned, 3D printed guide position and placement implant position. Materials and methods: Thirty-two duplicated maxillary resin models were used in the present in vitro study. Digital planning was performed and fabrication of a surgical template that allowed implant placement on the distal extension edentulous site of the model (maxillary left side). A first optical scan was performed after fitting the surgical template on the model to assess the deviation at the surgical guide level. After placing implants in the model using the surgical guide, scan bodies were attached to the implants, and a second scan was performed to record the position of placed implants. The digital representations were later superimposed to the pre-operative scan and measurements of implant deviations were performed. Global (coronal and apical), horizontal (coronal and apical), depth and angular deviations were recorded between planned implant position, guide position, and placement implant position. Three-way ANOVA was used to compare implant location (#13, 14, and 15), fixation pin (with or without pin), and guide comparison (planned, guided, and placement). Results: Final implant placement based on the digital plan and based on the 3D printed guide were very similar except for depth deviation. Use of fixation pin had a statistically significant effect on the depth and angular deviation. Overall, without fixation pins and based on guide versus placement, mean global coronal (0.88 ± 0.36 mm), horizontal coronal (0.55 ± 0.32 mm), and apical (1.44 ± 0.75 mm), and angular deviations (4.28 ± 2.01°) were similar to deviations with fixation pins: mean global coronal (0.88 ± 0.36 mm); horizontal coronal (0.67 ± 0.22 mm) and apical (1.60 ± 0.69 mm); and angular deviations (4.53 ± 2.04°). Horizontal apical without pins (1.63 ± 0.69 mm) and with fixation pins (1.72 ± 0.70 mm) was statistically significant (p = 0.044). Depth deviation without pins (-0.5 ± 0.5 mm) and with fixation pins (-0.16 ± 0.62 mm) was also statistically significant (p = 0.005). Further analysis demonstrated that the final sleeve position on the 3D printed guide was on average 0.5 mm more coronal than the digital plan. Conclusions: The use of surgical guides with or without fixation pins can provide clinically acceptable outcomes in terms of accuracy in implant position. There was a statistically significant difference in the accuracy of implant position when utilizing fixation pins only for horizontal apical and depth deviation. Additionally, a statistically significant difference between the planned and the 3D printed surgical guide when considering the sleeve position was detected.

Clinical study of precision analysis and deviation control of a domestic guide plate-assisted edentulous implant surgery

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

Accuracy of Intraoperative Measuring Guide and Conventional Surgical Guide in Anterior Implant Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Accuracy of Different Types of Computer-Aided Design/computer-Aided Manufacturing Surgical Guides for Dental Implant Placement.

Accuracy of Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Computer Numerical Control Milling for Edentulous Jaws: a Pilot Clinical Trial.

An in vitro study of the precision of CAD/CAM guides in the posterior area

Accuracy evaluation of a universal dental implant guide for simulating implantation in posterior area on dental molds

Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implant Surgery by a CAD/CAM and Laser Scanning Technique.

[Evaluation of the Fabrication Deviation of a Kind of Milling Digital Implant Surgical Guides].

[Nonradiological methods for implant surgical guide accuracy measurement].

In Vitro Accuracy Study of a Implanting NavigationTemplate

Accuracy of a Chairside, Fused Deposition Modeling Three-Dimensional-printed, Single Tooth Surgical Guide for Implant Placement: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Accuracy of a Milled Digital Implant Surgical Guide: an in Vitro Study

Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in the Partially Edentulous Jaw Using Digital impression versus Desktop Scanner and CBCT cast scan: Randomized Clinical Trial

Digital Versus Radiographic Accuracy Evaluation of Guided Implant Surgery: an in Vitro Study

The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery

Accuracy of Implant Guided Surgery in Fully Edentulous Patients: Prediction vs. Actual Outcome-Systematic Review

Accuracy Assessment of Implant Placement with Versus Without a CAD/CAM Surgical Guide by Novices Versus Specialists Via the Digital Registration Method: an in Vitro Randomized Crossover Study.

The Influence of Guide Stabilizers and Their Application Sequences on Trueness and Precision of Surgical Guides in Free End Situations: an in Vitro Analysis.

[Accuracy evaluation of static guided implant placement using an intraoral scan method].

The Precise Orientation of Preformed Titanium Plates in Digital Surgery Technology Assisted in Reconstruction Operations of Mandibular Segmental Defects