Abstract:Statement of problem. Conventional radiographic methods are widely used to evaluate the clinical accuracy of implant position. However, such methods require a second computerized tomography (CT) scan and manual registration between presurgical and postsurgical CT data. The alignment errors cannot be calculated. Purpose. The purpose of this clinical study was to introduce a completely digital registration method to evaluate the clinical accuracy of implant position. The digital registration method was then compared with the radiographic method in evaluating accuracy. Some of the alignment errors produced in the digital registration procedures were recorded. Material and methods. A total of 32 implants from 19 patients with sufficient bone volume were enrolled in the study, and all implant surgeries were conducted by one experienced practitioner. Before the surgery, a cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scan was made for each patient along with a diagnostic impression to design the ideal implant position using the Simplant software. After the surgery, the postsurgical implant position was determined using an optical scan of the dentition cast and a series of custom registration models (the digital registration method). A simulated cylinder was designed using the Geomagic Studio software to represent the implant, and the deviation of the ideal and postsurgical implant position was calculated. The accuracy evaluated by the 2 methods was also compared. The parameters of the entrance point, apical point, and axis were recorded for each implant. A part of the alignment errors in the digital registration was calculated automatically and recorded. One sample t test and paired t test were conducted by using a statistical software program. Results. The mean deviation between the ideal and postsurgical implant positions evaluated using the digital registration method was 0.84 +/- 0.57 mm for the entrance point, 1.03 +/- 0.78 mm for the apical point, and 4.52 +/- 2.37 degrees for the angulation. No significant difference was found between the accuracy evaluated by the digital registration method and the radiographic method (P>.05). In the digital registration procedure, the alignment error was 0.03 mm for the registration model and 0.29 mm for the dentition. Significant differences were found in the alignment procedure of the impression cylinder (P<.001) and dentition (P<.001). The average positive and negative errors were +0.09 and -0.19 mm for the simulated cylinder of the ideal implant and +0.08 and -0.15 mm for the simulated cylinder of the postsurgical implant. Conclusions. The precision of the digital registration method could be accepted in clinical applications. No significant difference was found between the digital registration method and the radiographic method in evaluating the clinical accuracy of the implant position. The digital registration method was able to control and minimize the alignment errors produced during data processing.

Digital Versus Radiographic Accuracy Evaluation of Guided Implant Surgery: an in Vitro Study

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

Accuracy of the evaluation of implant position using a completely digital registration method compared with a radiographic method.

[Research of Implant Accuracy Using a Digital Registration Method].

Fully Digital Workflow for Planning Static Guided Implant Surgery: A Prospective Accuracy Study

[Nonradiological methods for implant surgical guide accuracy measurement].

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

Accuracy of dental implants positioning in computer-assisted surgeries: in vitro study

Accuracy of a calibration method based on cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner data registration for robot-assisted implant placement: An in vitro study

Digital registration versus cone-beam computed tomography for evaluating implant position: a prospective cohort study

Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implant Surgery by a CAD/CAM and Laser Scanning Technique.

Accuracy evaluation of a universal dental implant guide for simulating implantation in posterior area on dental molds

Evaluation of the Impact of Digital Dentistry on the Precision of Implant Placement and Prosthesis Fabrication: An In-Vitro Study

An in vitro study of the precision of CAD/CAM guides in the posterior area

Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in the Partially Edentulous Jaw Using Digital impression versus Desktop Scanner and CBCT cast scan: Randomized Clinical Trial

Accuracy of a Milled Digital Implant Surgical Guide: an in Vitro Study

Influence Of Different Factors On The Accuracy Of Digital Impressions Of Multiple Implants: An In Vitro Study

Comparative accuracy of cone-beam CT and conventional multislice computed tomography for real-time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery

Accuracy Assessment of Implant Placement with Versus Without a CAD/CAM Surgical Guide by Novices Versus Specialists Via the Digital Registration Method: an in Vitro Randomized Crossover Study.

The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery

Digital Surgical Guides in Mandibular Genioplasty: Evaluating Precision Against Conventional Techniques