Abstract:Statement of problem. Conventional radiographic methods are widely used to evaluate the clinical accuracy of implant position. However, such methods require a second computerized tomography (CT) scan and manual registration between presurgical and postsurgical CT data. The alignment errors cannot be calculated. Purpose. The purpose of this clinical study was to introduce a completely digital registration method to evaluate the clinical accuracy of implant position. The digital registration method was then compared with the radiographic method in evaluating accuracy. Some of the alignment errors produced in the digital registration procedures were recorded. Material and methods. A total of 32 implants from 19 patients with sufficient bone volume were enrolled in the study, and all implant surgeries were conducted by one experienced practitioner. Before the surgery, a cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scan was made for each patient along with a diagnostic impression to design the ideal implant position using the Simplant software. After the surgery, the postsurgical implant position was determined using an optical scan of the dentition cast and a series of custom registration models (the digital registration method). A simulated cylinder was designed using the Geomagic Studio software to represent the implant, and the deviation of the ideal and postsurgical implant position was calculated. The accuracy evaluated by the 2 methods was also compared. The parameters of the entrance point, apical point, and axis were recorded for each implant. A part of the alignment errors in the digital registration was calculated automatically and recorded. One sample t test and paired t test were conducted by using a statistical software program. Results. The mean deviation between the ideal and postsurgical implant positions evaluated using the digital registration method was 0.84 +/- 0.57 mm for the entrance point, 1.03 +/- 0.78 mm for the apical point, and 4.52 +/- 2.37 degrees for the angulation. No significant difference was found between the accuracy evaluated by the digital registration method and the radiographic method (P>.05). In the digital registration procedure, the alignment error was 0.03 mm for the registration model and 0.29 mm for the dentition. Significant differences were found in the alignment procedure of the impression cylinder (P<.001) and dentition (P<.001). The average positive and negative errors were +0.09 and -0.19 mm for the simulated cylinder of the ideal implant and +0.08 and -0.15 mm for the simulated cylinder of the postsurgical implant. Conclusions. The precision of the digital registration method could be accepted in clinical applications. No significant difference was found between the digital registration method and the radiographic method in evaluating the clinical accuracy of the implant position. The digital registration method was able to control and minimize the alignment errors produced during data processing.

Accuracy of manual and artificial intelligence‐based superimposition of cone‐beam computed tomography with digital scan data, utilizing an implant planning software: A randomized clinical study

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

Accuracy of artificial intelligence‐based segmentation of the mandibular canal in CBCT

Validation of a novel AI-based automated multimodal image registration of CBCT and intraoral scan aiding presurgical implant planning

[Research of Implant Accuracy Using a Digital Registration Method].

Digital Versus Radiographic Accuracy Evaluation of Guided Implant Surgery: an in Vitro Study

Reliability of Artificial Intelligence-based Cone Beam Computed Tomography Integration with Digital Dental Images

Computer-Assisted Implant Planning: A Review of Data Registration Techniques

Accuracy of the evaluation of implant position using a completely digital registration method compared with a radiographic method.

Accuracy of Automatic and Manual Dynamic Navigation Registration Techniques for Dental Implant Surgery in Posterior Sites Missing a Single Tooth: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis.

Accuracy of a calibration method based on cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scanner data registration for robot-assisted implant placement: An in vitro study

Validation of automated registration of intraoral scan onto Cone Beam Computed Tomography for an efficient digital dental workflow

Accuracy of navigation guided implant surgery for immediate loading complete arch restorations: Prospective clinical trial

Accuracy of Impressions for Multiple Implants: A Comparative Study of Digital and Conventional Techniques

Accuracy of Different Registration Areas Using Active and Passive Dynamic Navigation Systems in Dental Implant Surgery: an in Vitro Study.

Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation with Accurate CBCT-patient Registration for Dental Implant Placement

Evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital implant impression techniques in bilateral distal extension cases: a randomized clinical trial

Endodontic Treatment Outcomes in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images—Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of AI

Impact of the superimposition methods on accuracy analyses in maxillary complete-arch digital implant investigation

Accuracy of an autonomous dental implant robotic system versus static guide-assisted implant surgery: A retrospective clinical study

Accuracy and patient-centered results of marker-based and marker-free registrations for dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial