Abstract:Abstract Principles form part and parcel of our law and legal discourse, so much so that we seldom think of what they are and what they entail. For centuries they have been invoked daily to interpret and argue about the law. But when it comes to matters of constitutional law, principles are further called upon to perform a perennially controversial function: to help police the boundaries of state action. In most common law jurisdictions with a written constitution, this function of principles runs against the generally accepted view that the exercise of judicial review must ultimately be governed and restricted by the terms of the national constitution. This Article argues that the exercise of judicial review based on principles is not confined to that view, once the relationship between principles and the constitution is unpacked and recontextualized. While the English-language literature on principles over the past half-century has been dominated by a select group of Anglo-American scholars, there is a wealth of untapped insights from other parts of the world. One of the major contributions by continental legal theorists even predates the earliest modern Anglo-American writings on the subject by more than a decade. Overall, the law literature in common law and civil law systems reveals a significant degree of commonalities in the basic characters of principles despite the absence of initial evidence of transsystemic borrowings. The wider conceptual inquiry also displays a shift in the focus of the debate, from the protracted search for a clear-cut distinction between rules and principles towards a redefinition of principles’ relationship with “written” law, be it in the form of a civil code or a constitutional instrument. From this inquiry reemerge “unwritten” principles not deriving from codified or legislated law although they have been used to develop the law. Translated into the constitutional domain, these unwritten principles bear no logical connection with the terms of the constitution. Their main functions cover the entire spectrum from serving as interpretive aids to making law by filling gaps. The theoretical framework fits with an ongoing four-century-old narrative of the evolution of constitutional principles and judicial review across most common law-based systems. Constitutional principles are another area where Anglo-American law and legal discourse is less exceptional and more universal than what many assume. Throughout modern Western history, legal battles have been fought and ensuing developments have been made on the grounds of principles. Our law and jurisprudence remain based on them.

Probe on the New Perspectives and Approaches on Precedents Study

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

"Precedent" in the Narrative of Chinese Legal History

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

The Formation of Precedent and the Case-guiding System in China

Study on Criminal Jurisprudence: Western Countries' Experience and China's Reality

Reflections on the Chinese Jurisprudence——The Nature of Jurisprudence and Different Approaches of Recently Chinese Jurisprudence

Research Progress of Traditional Chinese Legal Culture by American Jurists in the 21st Century:Subject Matter,Methodology and Prospect

Local Society,Ethical Traditions,Practice on the Rule of Law and Active Justice

Reflection on the Mode of Research on the Science of Criminal Procedure

Implementation and Contruction of Pretrial Conference System——A perspective of pretrial conferences' practice in Beijing and Shanghai

The Impact of Online Opinion on Justice: Two Cases in Comparative Law Perspective

Some Thoughts on Research on Traditional Laws

A Reflection on the Academic Approach of Chinese Civil Law:The Defects of over Emphasizing the Institutional Research and Its Remedy

Legal Principles, Constitutional Principles, and Judicial Review

The Different or the Same: the Different Kinds of Research Data's Value in Chinese Legal History

A Study of the Research Mode on the Traditional Legal Ideology of the Ancient China --citing an Example of "rite and Punishment" from the Confucianism Theory Before the Qin Dynasty

Discussion on Research Methodology of Law of Evidence.

The Jurisprudence of Case Guidance System

Major Tasks and Focuses on Civil Litigation Jurisprudence during the Transformation Period of China