The Different or the Same: the Different Kinds of Research Data's Value in Chinese Legal History

Qi-cheng LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15991/j.cnki.411028.2012.03.017
2012-01-01
Abstract:Since the establishment of Chinese legal history as a discipline at the turn of the 20th century,an agreement has been reached that different kinds of data have different values.This conclusion is drawn by Chinese scholars who combine traditional Chinese methods and western ones in their historical studies.The researchers have an inclination to consider all kinds of data equally important.This inclination has close ties with the researchers' historical view,the consciousness of the question and the style of research,so it's necessary to discriminate them.This tendency has impeded the goal of getting the truth,which is the researchers' first pursuit in their studies of Chinese legal history.On account of the rethinking profoundly on historical view,the consciousness of the question and the style of research,I think a more rational point on the value of the data must include these three parts:different kinds of data have different values,the researchers must think much of the familiar data and material object,pay attention to the reason why the new data is new and use them flexibly.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?