Abstract:This thesis analyzes the long—discussed issue of "difficulty in filing a lawsuit" in the area of civil procedure. This issue does not refer to the situation that the court cannot accept and hear a case due to its inconformity with relevant laws. It mainly refers to the situation that the court, considering some external factors, refuses to accept some cases which conform to the required conditions stipulated in laws, regulations and judicial interpretations. This thesis points out that one main reason of this issue is the judicial policy of our country which overcomes law. The judicial policy represents itself in civil jurisdiction as restriction and negativity. It means that judicial policy always restricts the acceptance of cases which are in line with the suing conditions. The court will restrict the acceptance of some cases, such as cases of illegal fund raising, infringement due to false information disclosed by listed company, bankruptcy disputes, tainted milk tort disputes, indemnification due to natural disaster such as earthquake, as well as cases that involve sensitive social, political and economic issues. The reasons for the restriction include the specialty of rule of law in our real Society, the limited judicial system and judicial capacity under the specified power structure, the limited regulating scope and function of existing law, and pragmatism, relativism and particularism in consciousness and methodology. In the reality of China, such adjustment by judicial policy is relative ly reasonable, for some controversies which concern legal disputes actually involve political and other social factors, which cannot be independently handled and solved by judicial departments. In our country, the influence of adjustment and regulation by law is very limited, and numerous social relations are regulated by administrative and policy—based rules. The status of judicial departments decides that they lack the capability of judging independently. However, the adjustment by judicial policy which overcomes law also bears high cost. It will obviously jeopardize the authority of law, and even sacrifice public's faith and dependence on rule of law. The author believes that in the background of social transformation including the transformation of rule of law, the judicial policy restriction on filing a lawsuit would be limited gradually and finally terminated.

Major Tasks and Focuses on Civil Litigation Jurisprudence during the Transformation Period of China

On Jurisprudence Leading to Judicial Path——the Realism Path of China's Jurisprudence

Legal Realism and Criminal Justice in Transitional Society

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Difficulty in Filing a Lawsuit: Thinking on a "Chinese Issue"

International Civil Litigation in China: A Practical Analysis of the Chinese Judicial System

Forty Themes on the Innovation and Development of Chinese Legal Research in the Reform and Opening Up Era

The Goal of Civil Litigation: Deviation and Unity among Theory Legislation and Practice

Lingering Between Centralization and Decentralization:Examination of Judicial Philosophy in Social Transformation Period

A Reflection on the Reform of Civil Litigation Mode:The Perspective of Judiciary Capacity in Solving Dispute

Reflections on Issues Concerning the Basic Principles of the Civil Procedural Law

An Analysis on the Involution of China’s Litigation Object Theory

The Jurisprudential Problems in the Early Stage of Chinese Litigation

The Theoretical Prospect in the Age of Rights

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

Study on Criminal Jurisprudence: Western Countries' Experience and China's Reality

The Research Methods Concerning the Status and Function of Civil Law, Commercial Law and Economical Law

THE REFORM OF CIVIL ONLINE LITIGATION IN CHINA: DEVELOPMENT AND PREDICAMENTS

The Position of Judges in Civil Litigation in Transitional China-Judicial Mediation and Case Management

Modification of Civil Procedure Law and Improvement of Civil Evidence System

Constructivism of Civil Procedure with Argumentation on Proceedings and Trials: And Advice on Revision and Promotion of Civil Procedural Law