The Judicial Non-Recognition of “moral Judgments” Beyond Legal Doctrines: A Discussion on the “jiang Ge Case” Chinese Full Text

王静,舒国滢

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-2229.2023.03.020

2023-01-01

Abstract:After the first trial verdict of the “Jiang Ge Case”, professor Sang Benqian argued that Liu Xin（Liu Nuanxi） was not legally at fault, but the introduction of the concepts of “redundant fault” and “shared difficulties” could rationalize the first trial verdict. While this is commendable in theory, the moral justification for justice is questionable. Although the second trial verdict was based on the “duty to ensure safety”, there were shortcomings in the identification of “security guarantee relationship” “subject of duty to ensure safety” and “direct fault”. Another approach to determine Liu Xin’s legal fault is to hold her liable for the “third-party liability” under Article 28 of the Tort Liability Law, based on the doctrine of the “double risk damage principle”.