THE REAL PLIGHT BETWEEN THE JUDICATURE AND PUBLIC OPINION AND ITS EXTRICATION IN TERMS OF JURISPRUDENCE

Tu Yunxin,Qin Qianhong
2013-01-01
Abstract:In this transitional phase,a daunting challenge posed to the Chinese judicature is the complicated interaction between the trial court and the public,when it comes to cases that gain popular attention. The key issues lie in both the authority of the judicial judgment and the public's faith in it. It is undoubtedly of crucial significance to arrive at a sound relationship between a society espousing democracy,and proper legal expressions among the public and legal rule. Specialists argue that public opinion stands as no replacement for professional judgments made by judges,while advocates of public opinion state that any judicial judgment should take into consideration the ideas and thoughts of the public. For advocates of responsive law,the court should respond favorably to reasonable public opinions without abandoning the foundation of its independent trials. In our opinion,considering the functional designs of the judicature in the constitutional system and the reality of public opinion in contemporary China,responsive law is preferable to the other two alternatives so as to provide a real solution to the present dilemma involving the interaction between the trial court and public opinion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?