Preparation‐based B 1+ mapping in the heart using Bloch–Siegert shifts
Paulina Šiurytė,Joao Tourais,Yi Zhang,Chiara Coletti,Christal van de Steeg‐Henzen,Stefano Mandija,Qian Tao,Markus Henningsson,Sebastian Weingärtner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30232
2024-07-25
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Abstract:Purpose To develop and evaluate a robust cardiac B1+ mapping sequence at 3 T, using Bloch–Siegert shift (BSS)‐based preparations. Methods A longitudinal magnetization preparation module was designed to encode |B1+| . After magnetization tip‐down, off‐resonant Fermi pulses, placed symmetrically around two refocusing pulses, induced BSS, followed by tipping back of the magnetization. Bloch simulations were used to optimize refocusing pulse parameters and to assess the mapping sensitivity. Relaxation‐induced B1+ error was simulated for various T1 /T2 times. The effective mapping range was determined in phantom experiments, and |B1+| maps were compared to the conventional BSS method and subadiabatic hyperbolic‐secant 8 (HS8) pulse‐sensitized method. Cardiac B1+ maps were acquired in healthy subjects, and evaluated for repeatability and imaging plane intersection consistency. The technique was modified for three‐dimensional (3D) acquisition of the whole heart in a single breath‐hold, and compared to two‐dimensional (2D) acquisition. Results Simulations indicate that the proposed preparation can be tailored to achieve high mapping sensitivity across various B1+ ranges, with maximum sensitivity at the upper B1+ range. T1 /T2 ‐induced bias did not exceed 5.2% . Experimentally reproduced B1+ sensitization closely matched simulations for B1+≥0.3B1,max+ (mean difference 0.031± 0.022, compared to 0.018± 0.025 in the HS8‐sensitized method), and showed 20‐fold reduction in the standard deviation of repeated scans, compared with conventional BSS B1+ mapping, and an equivalent 2‐fold reduction compared with HS8‐sensitization. Robust cardiac B1+ map quality was obtained, with an average test‐retest variability of 0.027± 0.043 relative to normalized B1+ magnitude, and plane intersection bias of 0.052± 0.031. 3D acquisitions showed good agreement with 2D scans (mean absolute deviation 0.055± 0.061). Conclusion BSS‐based preparations enable robust and tailorable 2D/3D cardiac B1+ mapping at 3 T in a single breath‐hold.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging