Improving B1+ ‐inhomogeneity tolerance by resolving non‐bijection in MP2RAGE R1 mapping: A 2D look‐up table approach demonstrated at 3 T

Lenno Ruijters,Torben Ellegaard Lund,Mads Sloth Vinding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30363
2024-11-13
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Abstract:Purpose Regarding in vivo, robust longitudinal relaxation rate (R1) mapping, the goal of the present paper is two‐fold. First, to verify that non‐bijective mapping in magnetization‐prepared 2 rapid gradient echo (MP2RAGE) imaging can be resolved through a two‐dimensional look‐up table approach. Second, that the expanded parameter space from this can be used to improve B1+ ‐inhomogeneity tolerance without other prerequisites. Theory By deriving a second contrast from the magnitude images of the MP2RAGE acquisition, ambiguities in the original MP2RAGE image resulting from non‐bijective transfer curves can be resolved. Such ambiguities may occur when protocols are optimized, such as for higher B1+ ‐inhomogeneity tolerance. A 2D look‐up table approach combines the available information to resolve these ambiguities during mapping. Methods At 3 T, we acquired MP2RAGE images with standard acquisition parameters and (non‐bijective) parameters optimized for B1+ ‐inhomogeneity tolerance. From 3 subjects across multiple sessions, we assessed the B1+ ‐inhomogeneity tolerance through excitation‐pulse amplitude scalings. Results The R1 maps resulting from the B1+ ‐optimized protocols showed greatly reduced B1+ effects across images but without additional scanner time. Meanwhile, these maps could only successfully be derived by a 2D look‐up table approach. Conclusion We show that it is possible to optimize for B1+ ‐inhomogeneity tolerance in MP2RAGE through sequence‐parameter settings, while still successfully estimating the R1 map with a two‐dimensional look‐up table approach. This without the need for an additional B1+ map. The increased parameter space enabled by the two‐dimensional look‐up table approach may further be used to adjust MP2RAGE acquisitions for improved scan times, signal‐to‐noise ratio, and/or contrast‐to‐noise ratio.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?