Adsorption Of Atomic And Molecular Oxygen On 3c-Sic(111) And ((111)Over-Bar) Surfaces: A First-Principles Study
Junjie Wang,Litong Zhang,Qingfeng Zeng,Gérard Louis Vignoles,Laifei Cheng,Alain Guette
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.125304
IF: 3.7
2009-01-01
Physical Review B
Abstract:Density-functional theory calculations were performed to investigate the adsorption of oxygen on 3CSiC (111) and ((111) over bar) surfaces, including single O atom, double O atoms, and variable oxygen coverage adsorptions. We find that the bridge (BR) and on-top (OT) sites are the most stable adsorption sites for the (111) and (111) over bar surfaces, respectively. According to the two-dimensional potential energy surface achieved, the lowest continuous oxygen diffusion path over the whole surface seems to be BR -> H3 -> BR -> BR -> neighbor -> etc. By studying the double O atoms adsorption on 3C-SiC(111) surface, we find that 2-BR is the most favorable configuration. By comparing adsorption energies and O-O distances with reference values, we get that there is an electronic induction effect, which helps to get a more stable adsorption structure, between neighboring O adatoms with small amount of negative charge, which favors a medium O-O distance. Spin-unrestricted first-principles molecular-dynamics calculations have been carried out to achieve more dynamic information and comprehensive understanding of the molecular oxygen adsorption on a 3C-SiC(111) surface. The results confirm our determined diffusion path and one of the preferred double atoms configuration. By studying the adsorption of oxygen at 3C-SiC(111) and (111) over bar surfaces as a function of oxygen coverage, we find that the adsorption energy initially increases [1/9-3/9 monolayer (ML)] then significantly decreases (3/9-6/9 ML) with increasing oxygen coverage and finally reaches a stable value (7/9-1.0 ML) for 3C-SiC(111) surface. For 3C-SiC(111) surface, the trend is similar to the (111) surface case; however the variation is small when the oxygen coverage is above 3/9 ML and the adsorption energy at 1/9 ML coverage is lower. By combining the results of adsorption energy, structure evolution, and electronic-density difference calculations, we get that the total adsorption energy is determined by the interaction between adatoms and surface reconstructions: attractive (espectively, repulsive) interactions between adatoms make the adsorption structure more (espectively, less) stable, i.e., it gets a larger (espectively, smaller) adsorption energy; however, surface reconstructions can eliminate the stress caused by repulsive interactions between adatoms and make the adsorption structure to be stable.