Efficacy of secondary laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

赖华健,钟文文,郭强,李俊涛,张翼飞,叶雷,马波,尧冰,瞿虎,邱剑光,王德娟
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2023.03.006
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the safety and efficacy of secondary laparoscopic pyeloplasty.Methods:From January 2018 to June 2022, the clinical data of 10 children in our hospital who underwent secondary laparoscopic pyeloplasty and 59 children who underwent primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty were collected. The baseline data, intraoperative, postoperative and follow-up data of the two groups were statistically analyzed, and the main clinical indicators were compared and analyzed. Postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo criteria. Surgical success was defined as clinical symptom relief and no worsening of hydrops at postoperative follow-up.Results:There was no significant difference in sex, age, body weight, affected kidney and clinical manifestation between the two groups (P>0.05). In the intraoperative and postoperative data, the median hospital stay for reoperation and the median postoperative hospital stay were longer in the secondary LP group (P<0.001). The total incidence of complications in the secondary LP group was higher (P=0.006), mainly Clavien-Dindo grade I complications. However, the surgical success rate was similar between the two groups (P=0.907).Conclusions:The grade of complications after secondary laparoscopic pyeloplasty is low, and the surgical success rate is similar to that of primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty. It is a safe and effective surgical approach for the failure of primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?