Abstract:Introduction: Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO), is a major cause of pathological hydronephrosis in children. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), has gained popularity due to its known advantages. LP faces technical difficulties and a steep learning curve. RALP has overcome these limitations, making it safer and more effective for children. The study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of LP and RALP in infants weighing ≤15 kg. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis (2010-2022). The study included pediatric patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of UPJO and weighed ≤15 kg. The patients were divided into two groups: LP and RALP. The study evaluated preoperative, intraoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data, including complications. Success was defined as no worsening of hydronephrosis on postoperative ultrasound in the first year of follow-up. Results: The total patients were 94: 42 in the LP group, and 52 in the RALP group. The median age at the intervention was 17.5 months (LAP group) versus 29 months (RALP group) (p = 0.01). The median weight at the time of intervention was 9.5 Kg (LP group), and 11.6 Kg (RALP group) (p = 0.44). The median operative time was significantly longer in the LP group: 245 min versus 125.5 min in the RALP group (p = 0.001). The median length of hospitalization was comparable: 4.3 days (LP group) and 3.5 days (RALP group) (p = 0.42). No intraoperative complications were reported in either group. There were no statistically significant differences regarding postoperative complications. During follow-up, all patients remained asymptomatic, with no episodes of urinary tract infection or abdominal pain, and none of them had a recurrence of UPJ obstruction. Consequently, the two techniques are equally effective and safe in the short term. Discussion: Both procedures offer excellent outcomes with comparable postoperative complications. LOS was similar for both groups, with no intraoperative complications or conversions, and a non-significant increase in postoperative complications. A notable finding was the significant difference in operation times between the procedures, emphasizing the importance of reduced surgical time in pediatric patients for minimizing anesthetic and intubation durations. Conclusion: For the absence of intra- and postoperative complications and recurrences, RALP is as effective as LP in pyeloplasty in children weighing 15 kg or less. This finding reinforces the idea that RALP can be safely executed, benefiting from its advanced technology and the learning curve, for patients of any age regarding pyeloplasty for UPJO.

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with Small Pelvis in Children

Preliminary results of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children

The application of artificial technology in pediatric pyeloplasty the efficacy analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Infants and Young Children

Analysis of outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children from a tertiary pediatric center in South India

Early Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Infants Under 3 Months With Severe Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Has robot-assisted pyeloplasty reached outcome parity with laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children <15 kg? A Paediatric YAU international multi-center study

Clinical analysis of conventional laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children

Modified robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children for ureteropelvic junction obstruction with long proximal ureteral stricture: The "double-flap" technique

Pyeloplasty in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction and Associated Kidney Anomalies: Can a Robotic Approach Make Surgery Easier?

Comparative Analysis of Robot Assisted Laparoscopy and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Comparison of robot-assisted single-port-plus-one pyeloplasty vs. laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

The experience of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children-a report of 343 cases

Early post-operative outcomes of robot-assisted pyeloplasty in patients with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty in Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Repeat Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Pediatric Patients

Application of robot-assisted laparoscopy for duplex kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

A controlled clinical trial of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of UPJO

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China.

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty for Treatment of Pediatric Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction(a Report of 16 Cases)