Abstract:Introduction: Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO), is a major cause of pathological hydronephrosis in children. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), has gained popularity due to its known advantages. LP faces technical difficulties and a steep learning curve. RALP has overcome these limitations, making it safer and more effective for children. The study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of LP and RALP in infants weighing ≤15 kg. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis (2010-2022). The study included pediatric patients who had a confirmed diagnosis of UPJO and weighed ≤15 kg. The patients were divided into two groups: LP and RALP. The study evaluated preoperative, intraoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data, including complications. Success was defined as no worsening of hydronephrosis on postoperative ultrasound in the first year of follow-up. Results: The total patients were 94: 42 in the LP group, and 52 in the RALP group. The median age at the intervention was 17.5 months (LAP group) versus 29 months (RALP group) (p = 0.01). The median weight at the time of intervention was 9.5 Kg (LP group), and 11.6 Kg (RALP group) (p = 0.44). The median operative time was significantly longer in the LP group: 245 min versus 125.5 min in the RALP group (p = 0.001). The median length of hospitalization was comparable: 4.3 days (LP group) and 3.5 days (RALP group) (p = 0.42). No intraoperative complications were reported in either group. There were no statistically significant differences regarding postoperative complications. During follow-up, all patients remained asymptomatic, with no episodes of urinary tract infection or abdominal pain, and none of them had a recurrence of UPJ obstruction. Consequently, the two techniques are equally effective and safe in the short term. Discussion: Both procedures offer excellent outcomes with comparable postoperative complications. LOS was similar for both groups, with no intraoperative complications or conversions, and a non-significant increase in postoperative complications. A notable finding was the significant difference in operation times between the procedures, emphasizing the importance of reduced surgical time in pediatric patients for minimizing anesthetic and intubation durations. Conclusion: For the absence of intra- and postoperative complications and recurrences, RALP is as effective as LP in pyeloplasty in children weighing 15 kg or less. This finding reinforces the idea that RALP can be safely executed, benefiting from its advanced technology and the learning curve, for patients of any age regarding pyeloplasty for UPJO.

[A comparative study of transcolonic and paracolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with UPJO]

Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large renal pelvic stones: a meta-analysis.

Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and open retroperitoneal surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Initial Experience with the Comprehensive Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Technique Based on Membrane Anatomy for Treating Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with Small Pelvis in Children

Efficacy of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pediatric hydronephrosis caused by symptomatic versus asymptomatic endogenous ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a retrospective analysis

Comparison of robot-assisted single-port-plus-one pyeloplasty vs. laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic single‐incision triangulated umbilical surgery pyeloplasty with traditional three‐hole surgery in a pediatric tertiary center

Comparative Analysis of Robot Assisted Laparoscopy and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Clinical analysis of conventional laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children

Experience with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty.

Comparison of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy and Open Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China.

Comparison of Three Surgical Methods of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Therapeutic Effect and Complication

Has robot-assisted pyeloplasty reached outcome parity with laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children <15 kg? A Paediatric YAU international multi-center study

A controlled clinical trial of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of UPJO

Meta-Analysis Of Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Approaches Of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty For Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Application of different CO2 pneumoperitoneum pressure in laparoscopic pyeloplasty for infants with ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Infants and Young Children

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve.

Comparison of Retrograde Balloon Dilatation and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Results of a 2-Year Follow-Up