Abstract:Objective:To compare various data of open pyeloplasty,laparoscopic pyeloplasty and en-dopyelotomy as a treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction(UPJO),and to investigate and discuss the feasibility and effect of the three methods.Methods:In the study,109 cases of UPJO treated by dif-ferent surgical approaches in Peking University People’s Hospital from January 2004 to December 2014 were retrospectively investigated.The patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment they received:open peyloplasty group (32 cases),laparoscopic peyloplasty group (31 cases)and en-dopyelotomy group (46 cases).We compared the data of the operative time,intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications and post-operative hospital stay among the three groups.The mean follow-up time was(51.9 ±40.1 )months (6 -132 months).Results:None of the laparoscopic peyloplties was converted to open peyloplasty.All endpyelotomies were successfully completed.The operative time was as follows:laparoscopic peyloplasty group (195.97 ±55.22)min,open peyloplasty group (121.19 ± 33.95)min and endopyelotomy group (74.04 ±33.95 )min,and there were significant differences among the three groups respectively(P <0.001 ).There was no significant difference on the operative blood loss between open peyloplasty group and laparoscopic peyloplasty group (P =0.163).The opera-tive blood loss of endopyelotomy group was 5(0,310)mL,which was lower than the other two groups,and this result had significant differences with the other two groups respectively(P <0.001).There were sig-nificant differences on the post-operative hospital stay (days)among open peyloplasty group,laparoscopic peyloplasty group and endopeylotomy group (P <0.05,respectively).The success rate was comparable between open peyloplasty group and laparoscopic peyloplasty group(93.8% vs.90.3%,P =0.672), while the endopeylotomy group had a lower success rate compared with both open surgery group and laparo-scopic group(69.6% vs.93.8%,P =0.01;69.6% vs.90.3%,P =0.048,respectively).The complica-tion rates of open peyloplasty group,laparoscopic peyloplasty group and endopeylotomy group were compa-rable(15.6%,16.1% and 13.0%,respectively,P >0.05).Conclusion:The laparoscopic peyloplasty group had a longer operative time than open peyloplasty group,while its post-operative stay was shorter. There was no significant difference on the operative blood loss between open peyloplasty group and laparo-scopic peyloplasty group.Although the success rate of endopyelotomy was lower than those of the other two groups,it had advantages over the aspect of operative time,operative blood loss and post operative stay.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and open pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Comparison of transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and open retroperitoneal surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Pure Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Correction of Retrocaval Ureter.

Clinical application of laparoscopic pyeloplasty combined with flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and kidney calculi

Experience with Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty.

Initial Experience with the Comprehensive Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Technique Based on Membrane Anatomy for Treating Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

A Modified Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty

Retroperitoneal laparoscopy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty (report of 6 cases)

Mini-Incision Dismembered Pyeloplasty Assisted by Retroperitoneal Laparoscopy in the Treatment of Adult Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Comparison of Three Surgical Methods of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Therapeutic Effect and Complication

Meta-Analysis Of Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Approaches Of Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty For Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve.

Comparison of Retrograde Balloon Dilatation and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Results of a 2-Year Follow-Up

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy or ureterolithotomy

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Anderson-Hynes Pyeloplasty in Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (report of 150 Cases)

Comparative Analysis of Robot Assisted Laparoscopy and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in the Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

RetrOperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Anderson-Hynes Pyeloplasty for the Treatment of UPJ Obstruction(report of 45 Cases)

Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China.

Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with Small Pelvis in Children

Technical improvement and practice of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)