Comparison of 2 questionnaires in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic wounds

LIU Jin,BAI Rui,ZHANG Peiying,FU Xiaojin,GUAN Hui,WEN Bing,QI Xin,DING Yanming,LI Huijuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.05.007

2023-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the reliability and validity of the Short Form-36 Health Survey（SF-36） and Euro Quality of Life Five-Dimensional Questionnaire（EQ-5D） in assessing the quality of life of patients with chronic wounds and the similarities and differences of their assessment on different dimensions. Methods Using convenience sampling,chronic wound patients treated in the wound center of a tertiary A hospital in Beijing from July 2019 to February 2022 were selected. The demographic data and disease related data were collected by a self-designed questionnaire. The patients’ quality of life was investigated by SF-36 and EQ-5D. Current situation of chronic wound patients’ quality of life were explored. By comparison of the 2 questionnaires,internal consistency,score correlation and score differences of patients grouped by the wound characteristics were compared and analyzed. Results A total of 144 patients were included in this study. The Physical Component Summary of SF-36was 224.52±94.36,and the Mental Component Summary was 282.88±90.77. EQ-5D utility score was 0.73±0.23,and the score of EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale was 72.90 ±20.60. The Cronbach’s α of SF-36 subscales and EQ-5D were 0.694 ～0.957 and 0.757,respectively,and the scores were significantly correlated（P ＜0.001）. Significant differences in SF-36 and EQ-5D scores were found among patients with different self-reporting wound changes（P＜0.05）. There were also statistically significant differences in EQ-5D scores among patients with different wound types,wound exudation volume and pain grades（P＜0.05）. Conclusion The quality of life in patients with chronic wounds is low,and the physical health is more significantly impaired. Both SF-36 and EQ-5D have good reliability and validity in assessing the quality of life of patients with chronic wounds. SF-36 is more comprehensive in assessing both physical and mental dimensions,and EQ-5D focuses mainly on physical dimension. Besides,EQ-5D is shorter and thus time-saving,and could better reflect different wound characteristics. Researchers are recommended to make the selection according to their research purposes and specific needs.