Questionnaire of quality of life in the evaluation of the quality of life

Liu Ting-jie,Chen Kun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.26.054
2006-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The questionnaire of World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) is an effective tool on the evaluation of QOL. What the questionnaire determined is the situations of the objects during recent two weeks,including physiology,psychology,independence,social relation,environment and spiritual or religious belief. Therefore WHOQOL can be used in the evaluations of QOL among people. DATA SOURCES: An overall retrieval was conducted on computer to identify the articles on the evaluations of QOL between January 1994 and December 2004 on China Hospital Digital Library (CHKD) using the key words of "measurement of quality of life,evaluation of quality of life" in Chinese. Meanwhile,we searched Medline database for the English articles of the evaluations of QOL published at the same time by imputing the key words of "Quality of life,Evaluation" into computer,and some related books were retrieved by handiwork. STUDY SELECTION: After the primary check,the associated articles with the origin,structure and application of the evaluation of QOL were chosen,and those unrelated articles were excluded. Inclusion criteria: The articles expatiating the source,structure,significance and application of the evaluation of QOL were collected. Whereas the repetitive researches were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Totally 66 articles of the evaluation of QOL were collected. There were 6 ones involved in the origin,11 in structure and 49 in application of the evaluation of QOL. And 35 articles were deleted,while 31 related articles were selected for reviews. DATA SYNTHESIS: The origin,structure and significance of the evaluation of QOL were briefly introduced,and then the principle,application and technological front of WHOQOL were summarized. WHOQOL is more suitable on the evaluation of QOL on the campus. CONCLUSION: The WHOQOL has the certain reliability and validity in the evaluation of QOL,and is more suitable for the evaluation of QOL in college studonts especially.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?