Abstract:On June 13, 2010, the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of State Security and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the Provisions on Issues Concerning the Examination and Evaluation of Evidence in Death Sentence Cases and the Provisions on Issues Concerning the Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence in Criminal Cases , effective as of July 1, 2010. The enforcement of these two provisions on criminal evidence is a huge improvement of Chinese criminal evidence system. These two provisions have clarified the procedures for court to hold illegal evidence, the assignment of burden of proof, and the corresponding standard of proof, which make the exclusionary rules against illegally obtained evidence operable. However, the two provisions on criminal evidence used some ambiguous languages regarding to the issues of the admissibility and the evaluation of evidence. The examination of evidence by judges should be divided into two steps. The first step is to determine the admissibility of evidence, in other words, the evidence should firstly be allowed to be used in the trial. The second step is to determine the reliability and the value of evidence, in other words, it concerns how to evaluate the admitted evidence. Judges should focus on the lawfulness and relevance of evidence in the first step, while focus on the truthfulness and sufficiency of evidence in the second. The rules of admissibility should be rigid, while the standards of reliability and value of evidence should be flexible. The separation of these two steps is good for the development of the evidence law. It shifts the research orientation, promotes the evidence rules, especially the exclusionary rules against illegally obtained evidence, and helps to prevent wrongful convictions by reinforcing legal acquisition of evidence.

Review of the Relationship Between Procedure and Evidence in Criminal Procedure:Comments on the Theoretical Model of “procedure Binary While Evidence Consistent” Chinese Full Text

A Research on Several Theoretical and Practical Issues of Criminal Evidential System Reform

The Rules of Evidence in Procedural Adjudication

The Future of Chinese Exclusionary Rules of Illegal Evidence: Reviewing Chinese Problems from the Perspectives of Internal Structure and Operational Environment

Several Basic Problems in Evidence System Reform

Preliminary Discussion on the Principles of Reviewing Evidence and Its Theoretical Basis

Discussion on electronic evidence rules in criminal procedure

Comment on the Evidence Part of the Criminal Procedural Law Amendment (Draft)

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

The Bright Spots and Difficult Spots in the Modification of Criminal Evidence System

A Theoretical Analysis of the Simultaneous Promulgation of "Two Provisions on Evidence"

Construction of the System of Proof Methods:A Discussion on How to Realize the Purpose of Lenient System of Pleaded Guilty and Recognized Fine

A Comparative Study on SeveralImportant Problems of the Criminal Procedure Law

On the Basic Theoretical Issue of Civil Evidence Investigation Procedure

Modification of Civil Procedure Law and Improvement of Civil Evidence System

On Admissibility and Reliability of Evidence

The Institutional Transformation and Theoretical Turn of China's Criminal Evidence Law: from the Perspective of Exclusionary Rule

The Burden of Proof in Civil Procedure

On the Necessary Angle and Possition of the Modification of PRC'Criminal Procedure Law——On the Comparision of Criminal Procedure Law and Crimanal Law

The exclusionary rules of illegal evidence and the justice of procedure

New Doctrine of Legal Evidence