Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

The exclusionary rules of illegal evidence and the justice of procedure

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Chinese Mode of Illegal Evidences' Exclusion

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

Theoretical anlysis on Exclusionary Rules of Illegal Evidence Chen Ruihua

What Kind of Rules for the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence Does China Need?

Exclusionary Rules in China

The Rules of Evidence in Procedural Adjudication

ON MECHANISM CONSTRUCTION OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FOR THE EXCLUSION OF ILLEGAL EVIDENCE——With the Perspective of PEOPLE'S PROCURATORATE FUNCTIONS

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

ON MECHANISM CONSTRUCTION OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FOR THE EXCLUSION OF ILLEGAL EVIDENCE-With the Perspective of PEOPLE’S PROCURATORATE FUNCTIONS

A Study of the Production Burden of the Exclusionary Rule for Illegally Obtained Evidence

Legal Values of the Rule of Voluntary Confession

The Political Heart of China’s Exclusionary Rule of Illegally Obtained Evidence: A Comparative Study with the International Criminal Court

On the Procedural Sanction of the Criminal Actions

Unpacking the Exclusionary Rule of Repeated Confessions in China

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

The Significant Reform of Criminal Evidence System and Its Extension

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Caution on Excessive Pursuit of the Efficiency of Criminal Procedure