Discussion on electronic evidence rules in criminal procedure

Chongyi Fan,Siyuan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1226.2015.05.001
2015-01-01
Abstract:In three major procedural laws of China, electronic evidence is regarded as an independent type of evidence and incorporated into legislation , which put an impact on traditional evidence rules. Throughout the existing laws and regulations, rules on collection, preservation, check, judgment and application of electronic evidence , are still scattered in some laws and judicial explanations. A great majority of scholars have acknowledged that we ushered the period of electronic evidence. Nevertheless,“legislation without rules” becomes the biggest bottleneck, which blocks the functions of electronic evidence. Practically, judicial authorities have to refer to the existing evidence rules, always leading to a phenomenon of“do not use, dare not use and can not use”, which makes a quantity of electronic evidences excluded from the proof of facts and is against the investigation of the truth and true verdicts. In addition to following the evidence of the true, complete, legal and other basic rules, we should also combine the characteristics of electronic evidence itself to improve its rules.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?