Abstract:Statement of problem. The accuracy of digital scanning for complete dental arch and implant-supported complete-arch restorations has been reported. However, research addressing the accuracy of digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation is lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of intraoral scanning, impression scanning, and cast scanning for complete-arch preparation.Material and methods. Maxillary and mandibular jaw typodonts with 28 teeth prepared for complete crowns were used as reference casts and digitized as reference data sets with a desktop scanner. Three digital scanning methods were applied. First, the reference casts were each scanned 10 times with an intraoral scanner to generate the intraoral scanning group data sets. Second, the reference casts were each captured 10 times by using polyvinyl siloxane impression material, and the impressions were scanned with a desktop scanner to generate the impression scanning group data sets. Third, the impressions obtained in the impression scanning group were used to make gypsum casts which were then digitized with a desktop scanner to generate the cast scanning group data sets. Accuracy was determined by trueness and precision. Three-dimensional deviations of the prepared arches and anterior and posterior segments were measured from root mean square values and depicted on color-difference maps. Differences among test groups were analyzed by using a 1-way ANOVA and the post hoc Bonferroni test for normally distributed data or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for non-normally distributed data (a=.05).Results. The trueness of the maxillary arch was significantly higher in the impression scanning group than in the cast scanning and intraoral scanning groups (P<.05), but no significant differences were found among the 3 groups of the mandibular arch (P>.05). The precision of both arches was significantly higher in the impression scanning and intraoral scanning groups than in the cast scanning group (P<.05). Color maps showed horizontal symmetrical displacement in the intraoral scanning group relative to the reference data sets and within-group unilateral distal-end distortion. Irregular arch deformations were noted in the impression scanning group, and buccal and occlusal expansion occurred in the anterior-posterior direction in the cast scanning group. Pooled data for anterior teeth indicated that the trueness was lowest in the intraoral scanning group; however, that for the maxillary anterior teeth did not differ, while that for the mandibular anterior teeth differed significantly among groups (P<.05). For the posterior teeth, deviation was the lowest in the impression scanning group, and significant differences were noted in both arches among the 3 groups (P<.05).Conclusions. Of the methods tested, impression scanning was the most accurate for the creation of a digital cast of a complete prepared arch. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1001-8)

Accuracy of the Preparation Depth in Mixed Targeted Restorative Space Type Veneers Assisted by Different Guides: an in Vitro Study.

Accuracy of three digital waxing-guided trial restoration protocols for controlling the depths of tooth preparation for ceramic veneers

3D Evaluation of Accuracy of Tooth Preparation for Laminate Veneers Assisted by Rigid Constraint Guides Printed by Selective Laser Melting.

Influence of scan extension and starting quadrant on the accuracy of four intraoral scanners for fabricating tooth-supported crowns

Effect of Machining Method and Margin Design on the Accuracy and Margin Quality of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns

Effects of stamp material and restoration depth on the accuracy of direct composite resin restorations using stamp technique

Preparing guiding planes for removable partial dentures: an in vitro comparison between assisted CAD-CAM template procedure and freehand preparation

In vitro comparison of guide planes for removable partial dentures prepared with CAD-CAM-assisted templates, guiding rod templates, and freehand

Digital Evaluation of Trueness and Precision of Modern Impression Materials in Implant- Retained Mandibular Overdentures

Mononuclear leukocyte levels of G proteins in depressed patients with bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder.

Echocardiographic measurements in clinically healthy ferrets anesthetized with isoflurane.

Dimensional Accuracy of Novel Vinyl Polysiloxane Compared with Polyether Impression Materials: An In Vitro Study

Accuracy of Three Types of Digital Guides for Crown Lengthening Surgery: an in Vitro Study

Accuracy of the intaglio surface of 3D-printed hybrid resin-ceramic crowns, veneers and table-tops: An in vitro study

Trueness and precision of an intraoral scanner on abutments with subgingival vertical margins: An in vitro study

The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis

[In vitro analysis of the influence of different tooth positions and retention depths of the pulp cavity on the accuracy of digital impression of the endocrown]

Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of veneers generated by the guided prosthetic tooth preparation system

Identification of optimal gingival displacement widths, finish line depths, and preparation designs for digitally scanned single crowns: An in vitro study

Scanning Accuracy of 10 Intraoral Scanners for Single-crown and Three-unit Fixed Denture Preparations: an in Vitro Study.

Accuracy of Three Digital Scanning Methods for Complete-Arch Tooth Preparation: an in Vitro Comparison