Multi-Rod Posterior Occipitocervical Instrumentation Constructs: A Biomechanical Analysis and Initial Case Series of 10 Patients with Complex Craniocervical Pathology

Andrew P. Collins,Muzammil Mumtaz,Sudharshan Tripathi,Shruthi K. Varier,Alexander W. Turner,Aaron J. Clark,Vijay K. Goel,Alekos A. Theologis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.022
IF: 4.297
2024-09-29
The Spine Journal
Abstract:Background Context Stabilization of the occipitocervical (OC) junction with posterior instrumentation plays a vital role in addressing a spectrum of pathologies. Due to limited bone surfaces of the occiput and C1 lamina, achieving union across the OC junction is challenging. Purpose To explore the biomechanics and a clinical series of patients treated with multi-rod constructs across the OC junction using a novel occipital plate with single- and dual-headed, modular tulip heads. Study Design/Setting Biomechanical analysis and retrospective case series. Patient Sample Adults at a single institution who underwent posterior cervical multi-rod constructs across the OC junction. Outcome Measures OC-C4 range of motion (ROM), maximum von Mises stress on the rods, and adjacent segment ROMs and intradiscal parameters. Patient demographics, revision operations, rod breakages, wound complications. Methods A validated occiput-cervical finite element (FE) model was used to simulate OC-C4 cervical fixation under multi-directional pure moment loading. A total of 4 rod configurations were simulated: (A) 2-rod-Ti (4.0 mm titanium rods); (B) 2-rod-CoCr (3.5 mm cobalt chrome rods); (C) 3-rods (4.0 mm titanium rods); (D) 4-rods (4.0 mm titanium rods). The aforementioned measures were compared. A retrospective analysis was also performed of adults at a single institution who underwent posterior cervical multi-rod constructs across the OC junction. Results Biomechanically, lowest primary rod stresses were observed for 3- and 4-rod constructs. Compared to 2-rod-Ti (121.8 MPa), 2-rod-CoCr showed a 43.2% stress increase in the rods, while 3- and 4-rods experienced rod stress reductions of 20% and 23.2%, respectively. No appreciable differences in OC-C4 ROM, C4-5 ROM, and C4-5 discal stresses were found between multi-rod and 2-rod constructs. Maximum occipital and C4 screw stresses were decreased in multi-rod constructs compared to 2-rods, with least stresses noted in the 4-rod construct. Maximum plate stresses were slightly increased in the 4-rod construct compared to 2- and 3-rod fixation, though the forces were largely similar among the constructs.Ten patients (average age 66.4 ± 10.6 years; 8 males) were assessed clinically. Nine of the ten operations were for primary stabilization of pathological fractures and associated craniocervical and/or atlantoaxial instability using 4-rods across the OC junction. At an average follow-up time of 1.58 ± 0.5 years (range, 1 - 2.3 years), there were no instrumentation failures, no adjacent segment failures, and no wound complications. Conclusions In this proof-of-concept investigation, multiple rods (3- and 4-rods) across the OC junction using a novel occipital plate with single- and dual-headed, modular tulips was safe and effective in stabilizing the OC junction. Accompanying FE analysis demonstrated that multi-rod constructs decreased primary rod stresses and had lower stresses on occipital and C4 screws compared to 2-rod constructs, while occipital plate stresses were largely similar. Additional clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine the ultimate utility of multi-rod constructs across the OC junction.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?