Abstract:In realistic world individuals with high reputation are more likely to influence the collective behaviors. Due to the cost and error of information dissemination, however, it is unreasonable to assign each individual with a complete cognitive power, which means that not everyone can accurately realize others' reputation situation. Here we introduce the mechanism of inferring reputation into the selection of potential strategy sources to explore the evolution of cooperation. Before the game each player is assigned with a randomly distributed parameter p denoting his ability to infer the reputation of others. The parameter p of each individual is kept constant during the game. The value of p indicates that the neighbor possessing highest reputation is chosen with the probability p and randomly choosing an opponent is left with the probability 1-p. We find that this novel mechanism can be seen as an universally applicable promoter of cooperation, which works on various interaction networks and in different types of evolutionary game. Of particular interest is the fact that, in the early stages of evolutionary process, cooperators with high reputation who are easily regarded as the potential strategy donors can quickly lead to the formation of extremely robust clusters of cooperators that are impervious to defector attacks. These clusters eventually help cooperators reach their undisputed dominance, which transcends what can be warranted by the spatial reciprocity alone. Moreover, we provide complete phase diagrams to depict the impact of uncertainty in strategy adoptions and conclude that the effective interaction topology structure may be altered under such a mechanism. When the estimation of reputation is extended, we also show that the moderate value of evaluation factor enables cooperation to thrive best. We thus present a viable method of understanding the ubiquitous cooperative behaviors in nature and hope that it will inspire further studies to resolve social dilemmas.

Reputation-based Probabilistic Punishment on the Evolution of Cooperation in the Spatial Public Goods Game

The evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods game with tolerant punishment based on reputation threshold

Impact of reputation-based switching strategy between punishment and social exclusion on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game

The Role of Reputation to Reduce Punishment Costs in Spatial Public Goods Game

Reputation Evaluation with Tolerance and Reputation-Dependent Imitation on Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Conditional Punishment Resolves Social Dilemma in Spatial Network

How to Evaluate One's Behavior Toward ‘bad’ Individuals? Exploring Good Social Norms in Promoting Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games

Cooperation dynamics in spatial public goods games with graded punishment mechanism

Reputation-dependent social learning on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games

Reputation preferences resolve social dilemmas in spatial multigames

Multigames with Social Punishment and the Evolution of Cooperation

Probabilistic Punishment on Free Riders in Threshold Public Goods Games

The Influence of Fine Distribution and Compensation on Cooperation in Public Goods Game

Reputation and Punishment sustain cooperation in the Optional Public Goods Game

Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games

The impact of current and historical reputation with non-uniform change on cooperation in spatial public goods game

Based on Reputation Consistent Strategy Times Promotes Cooperation in Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

The role of punishment in the spatial public goods game

Reputation-Based Conditional Investment Enhances the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Effect of Reputation-Based Heterogeneous Investment on Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Effects of punishment driven by inequity aversion on promoting cooperation in public goods games